| 1 | assert_fact | Use requester/2, approver/2, manager_of/2, delegate_of/2, conflict/2, eligible/1. |
| 2 | assert_fact | assert rule conflict(C, P) :- requester(C, P), approver(C, P). |
| 3 | assert_fact | assert rule conflict(C, M) :- requester(C, P), manager_of(M, P), approver(C, M). |
| 4 | assert_fact | assert rule conflict(C, D) :- requester(C, P), manager_of(M, P), delegate_of(D, M), approver(C, D). |
| 5 | assert_fact | assert rule eligible(C) :- requester(C, R), approver(C, A), R \= A. |
| 6 | retract | {'utterance': 'claim_88 is dana she self approved it manager is leo delegate is rosa switch signoff leo then no make it nora', 'clarification_answers': ['Set requester(claim_88, dana). Set approver(claim_88, dana). Set manager_of(leo, dana). Set delegate_of(rosa, leo).', 'Retract approver(claim_88, dana). Set approver(claim_88, leo). Retract approver(claim_88, leo). Set approver(claim_88, nora).'], 'max_clarification_rounds': 2} |
| 7 | assert_fact | Set requester(claim_88, dana). Set approver(claim_88, dana). Set manager_of(leo, dana). Set delegate_of(rosa, leo). |
| 8 | retract | retract fact approver(claim_88, dana). |
| 9 | assert_fact | Set approver(claim_88, leo). |
| 10 | retract | retract fact approver(claim_88, leo). |
| 11 | assert_fact | Set approver(claim_88, nora). |
| 12 | assert_fact | query requester(claim_88, dana). |
| 13 | assert_fact | query approver(claim_88, nora). |
| 14 | assert_fact | query conflict(claim_88, dana). |
| 15 | assert_fact | query conflict(claim_88, leo). |
| 16 | assert_fact | query conflict(claim_88, rosa). |
| 17 | assert_fact | query eligible(claim_88). |