Capture run provenance and prompt/version settings for reproducibility.
{
"run_id": "run-20260412T113754Z-rung_410_progress_goal_c-qwen35_semparse_9b-3360",
"run_started_utc": "2026-04-12T11:37:54+00:00",
"run_finished_utc": "2026-04-12T11:38:52+00:00",
"scenario": "rung_410_progress_goal_context_steering",
"ontology_kb_name": "rung_410_no_progress",
"backend": "ollama",
"model": "qwen35-semparse:9b",
"model_settings": {
"temperature": 0,
"context_length": 8192,
"classifier_context_length": 2048,
"timeout_seconds": 120,
"runtime": "core",
"two_pass": true,
"split_extraction": true,
"strict_registry": false,
"strict_types": false,
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"max_clarification_rounds": 2,
"require_final_confirmation": false,
"progress_memory_enabled": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"clarification_auto_answer_enabled": false,
"clarification_answer_backend": "",
"clarification_answer_base_url": "",
"clarification_answer_model": "",
"clarification_answer_context_length": 0,
"clarification_answer_history_turns": 0,
"clarification_answer_kb_clause_limit": 0,
"clarification_answer_kb_char_budget": 0,
"clarification_answer_min_confidence": 0.0,
"clarification_answer_source_prefix": "",
"clarification_answer_role": "",
"served_llm_model": "",
"served_llm_backend": "",
"served_llm_base_url": "",
"served_llm_context_length": 0,
"backend_options": {
"num_ctx": 8192
}
},
"prompt_provenance": {
"status": "ok",
"prompt_id": "sp-1e43c641b01b",
"prompt_sha256": "1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e",
"source_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\semantic_parser_system_prompt.md",
"snapshot_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\history\\prompts\\sp-1e43c641b01b.md",
"snapshot_created": false,
"char_count": 9603,
"line_count": 221,
"preview": "# Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B)\nUse this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures.\nKeep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict.\n## Core Priorities\n1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema.\n2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments.\n3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match.\n4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved."
}
}prompt_id=sp-1e43c641b01b prompt_sha256=1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e snapshot_path=D:\_PROJECTS\prethinker\modelfiles\history\prompts\sp-1e43c641b01b.md preview: # Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B) Use this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures. Keep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict. ## Core Priorities 1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema. 2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments. 3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match. 4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved.
We are maintaining family lineage and ancestor continuity.
{
"expected_utterance": "We are maintaining family lineage and ancestor continuity.",
"observed_utterance": "We are maintaining family lineage and ancestor continuity.",
"route": "other",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "other",
"logic_string": "",
"components": {
"atoms": [],
"variables": [],
"predicates": []
},
"facts": [],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 1.0,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 1.0
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.0,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Statement describes a system goal, not a fact, rule, or query?",
"clarification_reason": "Statement describes a system goal, not a fact, rule, or query.",
"rationale": "Statement describes a system goal, not a fact, rule, or query."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "skipped",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 0.75,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Statement describes a system goal, not a fact, rule, or query?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.0,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.0,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": false,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: We are maintaining family lineage and ancestor continuity. / We are maintaining family lineage and ancestor continuity. Route expected/observed: assert_fact / other Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=other apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped effect=none message=Intent=other; no KB mutation/query applied.
intent=other logic= facts=[] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.0 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Statement describes a system goal, not a fact, rule, or query? clarification_reason=Statement describes a system goal, not a fact, rule, or query. predicates=[] atoms=[] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Statement describes a system goal, not a fact, rule, or query?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.0, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.0, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': False, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped
note(lineage_ticket_17).
{
"expected_utterance": "note(lineage_ticket_17).",
"observed_utterance": "note(lineage_ticket_17).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "note(lineage_ticket_17).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"lineage_ticket_17"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"note"
]
},
"facts": [
"note(lineage_ticket_17)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 1.0,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 1.0
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.0,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of atomic fact with explicit argument?",
"clarification_reason": "Direct mapping of atomic fact with explicit argument.",
"rationale": "Direct mapping of atomic fact with explicit argument."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of atomic fact with explicit argument?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.0,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.0,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": false,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: note(lineage_ticket_17). / note(lineage_ticket_17). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=note(lineage_ticket_17). result_type=fact_asserted fact=note(lineage_ticket_17).
intent=assert_fact logic=note(lineage_ticket_17). facts=['note(lineage_ticket_17).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.0 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of atomic fact with explicit argument? clarification_reason=Direct mapping of atomic fact with explicit argument. predicates=['note'] atoms=['lineage_ticket_17'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of atomic fact with explicit argument?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.0, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.0, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': False, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
parent(alice, bob).
{
"expected_utterance": "parent(alice, bob).",
"observed_utterance": "parent(alice, bob).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "parent(alice, bob).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"alice",
"bob"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"parent"
]
},
"facts": [
"parent(alice, bob)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 1.0,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 1.0
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.0,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct fact assertion with explicit entities and canonical predicate?",
"clarification_reason": "Direct fact assertion with explicit entities and canonical predicate.",
"rationale": "Direct fact assertion with explicit entities and canonical predicate. Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct fact assertion with explicit entities and canonical predicate?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.0,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.0,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": false,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: parent(alice, bob). / parent(alice, bob). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=parent(alice, bob). result_type=fact_asserted fact=parent(alice, bob).
intent=assert_fact logic=parent(alice, bob). facts=['parent(alice, bob).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.0 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct fact assertion with explicit entities and canonical predicate? clarification_reason=Direct fact assertion with explicit entities and canonical predicate. predicates=['parent'] atoms=['alice', 'bob'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct fact assertion with explicit entities and canonical predicate?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.0, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.0, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': False, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
query note(lineage_ticket_17).
{
"expected_utterance": "query note(lineage_ticket_17).",
"observed_utterance": "query note(lineage_ticket_17).",
"route": "query",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "query",
"logic_string": "note(lineage_ticket_17).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"lineage_ticket_17"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"note"
]
},
"facts": [],
"rules": [],
"queries": [
"note(lineage_ticket_17)."
],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.95,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 0.95
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a fact. Predicate?",
"clarification_reason": "Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a fact. Predicate",
"rationale": "Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a fact. Predicate 'note' is reused from ontology. Argument 'lineage_ticket_17' is explicit."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 0.75,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a fact. Predicate?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": false,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: query note(lineage_ticket_17). / query note(lineage_ticket_17). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / query Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=query apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success effect=none submitted=note(lineage_ticket_17). result_type=table
intent=query logic=note(lineage_ticket_17). facts=[] rules=[] queries=['note(lineage_ticket_17).'] uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a fact. Predicate? clarification_reason=Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a fact. Predicate predicates=['note'] atoms=['lineage_ticket_17'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a fact. Predicate?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': False, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success
query parent(alice, bob).
{
"expected_utterance": "query parent(alice, bob).",
"observed_utterance": "query parent(alice, bob).",
"route": "query",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "query",
"logic_string": "parent(alice, bob).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"alice",
"bob"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"parent"
]
},
"facts": [],
"rules": [],
"queries": [
"parent(alice, bob)."
],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.95,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 0.95
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: User explicitly requests a query for the fact parent(alice, bob). No ambiguity?",
"clarification_reason": "User explicitly requests a query for the fact parent(alice, bob). No ambiguity",
"rationale": "User explicitly requests a query for the fact parent(alice, bob). No ambiguity or missing arguments detected."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 0.75,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: User explicitly requests a query for the fact parent(alice, bob). No ambiguity?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": false,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: query parent(alice, bob). / query parent(alice, bob). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / query Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=query apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success effect=none submitted=parent(alice, bob). result_type=table
intent=query logic=parent(alice, bob). facts=[] rules=[] queries=['parent(alice, bob).'] uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: User explicitly requests a query for the fact parent(alice, bob). No ambiguity? clarification_reason=User explicitly requests a query for the fact parent(alice, bob). No ambiguity predicates=['parent'] atoms=['alice', 'bob'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: User explicitly requests a query for the fact parent(alice, bob). No ambiguity?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': False, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success
Run deterministic KB validations and compare against expectations.
{
"validation_total": 2,
"validation_passed": 2,
"overall_status": "passed",
"turn_parse_failures": 0,
"turn_apply_failures": 0
}score=1.0 (2/2 passed)
lineage_note_recorded: PASS (query=note(lineage_ticket_17)., expected=success, observed=success) lineage_parent_recorded: PASS (query=parent(alice, bob)., expected=success, observed=success)
query=note(lineage_ticket_17). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=parent(alice, bob). expected=success observed=success reasons=none