Semantic Parser Run: rung_390_progress_goal_directed_clarification (rung_390_progress_goal_directed_clarification)

Back to Docs Hub View Repo
Captured: 2026-04-12T13:05:52+00:00 | Model: qwen35-semparse:9b | Integration: ollama | Initial skin: standard | Rendered: 2026-04-12 13:05:52 UTC

run_context

User
Capture run provenance and prompt/version settings for reproducibility.
tool calls0

No tool calls captured.

Pre-Thinker
{
  "run_id": "run-20260412T111941Z-rung_390_progress_goal_d-qwen35_semparse_9b-28320",
  "run_started_utc": "2026-04-12T11:19:41+00:00",
  "run_finished_utc": "2026-04-12T11:20:40+00:00",
  "scenario": "rung_390_progress_goal_directed_clarification",
  "ontology_kb_name": "rung_390_progress_goal_directed_clarification",
  "backend": "ollama",
  "model": "qwen35-semparse:9b",
  "model_settings": {
    "temperature": 0,
    "context_length": 8192,
    "classifier_context_length": 2048,
    "timeout_seconds": 120,
    "runtime": "core",
    "two_pass": true,
    "split_extraction": true,
    "strict_registry": false,
    "strict_types": false,
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
    "max_clarification_rounds": 2,
    "require_final_confirmation": false,
    "progress_memory_enabled": true,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "clarification_auto_answer_enabled": false,
    "clarification_answer_backend": "",
    "clarification_answer_base_url": "",
    "clarification_answer_model": "",
    "clarification_answer_context_length": 0,
    "clarification_answer_history_turns": 0,
    "clarification_answer_kb_clause_limit": 0,
    "clarification_answer_kb_char_budget": 0,
    "clarification_answer_min_confidence": 0.0,
    "clarification_answer_source_prefix": "",
    "clarification_answer_role": "",
    "served_llm_model": "",
    "served_llm_backend": "",
    "served_llm_base_url": "",
    "served_llm_context_length": 0,
    "backend_options": {
      "num_ctx": 8192
    }
  },
  "prompt_provenance": {
    "status": "ok",
    "prompt_id": "sp-1e43c641b01b",
    "prompt_sha256": "1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e",
    "source_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\semantic_parser_system_prompt.md",
    "snapshot_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\history\\prompts\\sp-1e43c641b01b.md",
    "snapshot_created": false,
    "char_count": 9603,
    "line_count": 221,
    "preview": "# Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B)\nUse this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures.\nKeep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict.\n## Core Priorities\n1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema.\n2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments.\n3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match.\n4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved."
  }
}
Prompt Provenance
info
prompt_id=sp-1e43c641b01b
prompt_sha256=1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e
snapshot_path=D:\_PROJECTS\prethinker\modelfiles\history\prompts\sp-1e43c641b01b.md
preview:
# Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B)
Use this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures.
Keep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict.
## Core Priorities
1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema.
2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments.
3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match.
4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved.

turn_01: other [skipped]

User
We are tracking maritime handoff custody and seal continuity.
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::none { "turn_index": 1, "input": null }
    output
    {
  "status": "skipped",
  "message": "Intent=other; no KB mutation/query applied."
}
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "We are tracking maritime handoff custody and seal continuity.",
  "observed_utterance": "We are tracking maritime handoff custody and seal continuity.",
  "route": "other",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "model",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "other",
    "logic_string": "",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": []
    },
    "facts": [],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.95,
      "intent": 1.0,
      "logic": 1.0
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.05,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a declarative statement of intent/context, not a fact, rule, or?",
    "clarification_reason": "Utterance is a declarative statement of intent/context, not a fact, rule, or",
    "rationale": "Utterance is a declarative statement of intent/context, not a fact, rule, or query."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "skipped",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 0.75,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a declarative statement of intent/context, not a fact, rule, or?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.05,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
    "threshold": 0.65,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": true,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 17,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 10,
    "overlap_term_count": 5,
    "progress_overlap_terms": [
      "continuity",
      "custody",
      "handoff",
      "maritime",
      "seal"
    ],
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.667,
    "progress_relevance_score": 0.667
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: We are tracking maritime handoff custody and seal continuity. / We are tracking maritime handoff custody and seal continuity.
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / other
Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=other apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped
effect=none
message=Intent=other; no KB mutation/query applied.
KB Elements
info
intent=other
logic=
facts=[]
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a declarative statement of intent/context, not a fact, rule, or?
clarification_reason=Utterance is a declarative statement of intent/context, not a fact, rule, or
predicates=[]
atoms=[] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a declarative statement of intent/context, not a fact, rule, or?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 17, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 10, 'overlap_term_count': 5, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['continuity', 'custody', 'handoff', 'maritime', 'seal'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.667, 'progress_relevance_score': 0.667}
Turn Score
score
score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped

turn_02: assert_fact [success]

User
person(riven).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 2, "input": "carries(riven)." }
    output
    {
  "status": "success",
  "result_type": "fact_asserted",
  "fact": "carries(riven)."
}
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "person(riven).",
  "observed_utterance": "person(riven).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "model",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "carries(riven).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "riven"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "carries"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "carries(riven)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.95,
      "intent": 1.0,
      "logic": 0.95
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.05,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance 'person(riven)' combined with context 'custody chain' and predicate 'carries' implies riven?",
    "clarification_reason": "Utterance 'person(riven)' combined with context 'custody chain' and predicate 'carries' implies riven",
    "rationale": "Utterance 'person(riven)' combined with context 'custody chain' and predicate 'carries' implies riven is the carrier. Mapping to carries(riven)."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [
    {
      "round": 1,
      "question": "How does this relate to current focus 'maritime handoff custody carries brass_seal'?",
      "answer": "This establishes riven as the named carrier in the custody chain.",
      "answer_source": "scenario_scripted",
      "uncertainty_score": 0.0,
      "effective_uncertainty": 0.8,
      "threshold": 0.65
    }
  ],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance 'person(riven)' combined with context 'custody chain' and predicate 'carries' implies riven?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.05,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
    "threshold": 0.65,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": true,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 17,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 36,
    "overlap_term_count": 9,
    "progress_overlap_terms": [
      "brass",
      "carrier",
      "carries",
      "custody",
      "handoff",
      "maritime",
      "riven",
      "seal",
      "the"
    ],
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 1.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: person(riven). / person(riven).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=carries(riven).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=carries(riven).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=carries(riven).
facts=['carries(riven).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance 'person(riven)' combined with context 'custody chain' and predicate 'carries' implies riven?
clarification_reason=Utterance 'person(riven)' combined with context 'custody chain' and predicate 'carries' implies riven
predicates=['carries']
atoms=['riven'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance 'person(riven)' combined with context 'custody chain' and predicate 'carries' implies riven?
rounds_used=1 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 17, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 36, 'overlap_term_count': 9, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['brass', 'carrier', 'carries', 'custody', 'handoff', 'maritime', 'riven', 'seal', 'the'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 1.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_03: assert_fact [skipped]

User
he carries brass_seal.
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 3, "input": "carries(riven, brass_seal)." }
    output
    {
  "status": "skipped",
  "message": "Fact already present in corpus."
}
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "he carries brass_seal.",
  "observed_utterance": "he carries brass_seal.",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "model",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "carries(riven, brass_seal).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "brass_seal",
        "riven"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "carries"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "carries(riven, brass_seal)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 1.0,
      "intent": 1.0,
      "logic": 1.0
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.0,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Resolved pronoun 'he' to 'riven' via clarification transcript. Mapped 'carries' relation with?",
    "clarification_reason": "Resolved pronoun 'he' to 'riven' via clarification transcript. Mapped 'carries' relation with",
    "rationale": "Resolved pronoun 'he' to 'riven' via clarification transcript. Mapped 'carries' relation with subject 'riven' and object 'brass_seal'."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "skipped",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [
    {
      "round": 1,
      "question": "Who does 'he' refer to?",
      "answer": "he means riven",
      "answer_source": "scenario_scripted",
      "uncertainty_score": 0.7,
      "effective_uncertainty": 0.82,
      "threshold": 0.65
    }
  ],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Resolved pronoun 'he' to 'riven' via clarification transcript. Mapped 'carries' relation with?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.0,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.0,
    "threshold": 0.65,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": true,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 17,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 27,
    "overlap_term_count": 6,
    "progress_overlap_terms": [
      "brass",
      "carries",
      "riven",
      "seal",
      "the",
      "who"
    ],
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.833,
    "progress_relevance_score": 0.833
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: he carries brass_seal. / he carries brass_seal.
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=skipped
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=carries(riven, brass_seal).
message=Fact already present in corpus.
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=carries(riven, brass_seal).
facts=['carries(riven, brass_seal).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.0 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Resolved pronoun 'he' to 'riven' via clarification transcript. Mapped 'carries' relation with?
clarification_reason=Resolved pronoun 'he' to 'riven' via clarification transcript. Mapped 'carries' relation with
predicates=['carries']
atoms=['brass_seal', 'riven'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Resolved pronoun 'he' to 'riven' via clarification transcript. Mapped 'carries' relation with?
rounds_used=1 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.0, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.0, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 17, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 27, 'overlap_term_count': 6, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['brass', 'carries', 'riven', 'seal', 'the', 'who'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.833, 'progress_relevance_score': 0.833}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=skipped

turn_04: query [success]

User
query carries(riven, brass_seal).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::query_rows { "turn_index": 4, "input": "carries(riven, brass_seal)." }
    output
    {
  "status": "success",
  "result_type": "table",
  "predicate": "carries",
  "prolog_query": "carries(riven, brass_seal).",
  "variables": [],
  "rows": [
    {}
  ],
  "num_rows": 1,
  "reasoning_basis": {
    "kind": "core-local"
  }
}
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "query carries(riven, brass_seal).",
  "observed_utterance": "query carries(riven, brass_seal).",
  "route": "query",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "model",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "query",
    "logic_string": "carries(riven, brass_seal).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "brass_seal",
        "riven"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "carries"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [
      "carries(riven, brass_seal)."
    ],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.95,
      "intent": 1.0,
      "logic": 0.95
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.05,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of 'carries(riven, brass_seal)' to query intent. Predicate 'carries' is canonical?",
    "clarification_reason": "Direct mapping of 'carries(riven, brass_seal)' to query intent. Predicate 'carries' is canonical.",
    "rationale": "Direct mapping of 'carries(riven, brass_seal)' to query intent. Predicate 'carries' is canonical. Arguments are explicit."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 0.75,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of 'carries(riven, brass_seal)' to query intent. Predicate 'carries' is canonical?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.05,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
    "threshold": 0.65,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": true,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 17,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 8,
    "overlap_term_count": 4,
    "progress_overlap_terms": [
      "brass",
      "carries",
      "riven",
      "seal"
    ],
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.6,
    "progress_relevance_score": 0.6
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: query carries(riven, brass_seal). / query carries(riven, brass_seal).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / query
Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=query apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success
effect=none
submitted=carries(riven, brass_seal).
result_type=table
KB Elements
info
intent=query
logic=carries(riven, brass_seal).
facts=[]
rules=[]
queries=['carries(riven, brass_seal).']
uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of 'carries(riven, brass_seal)' to query intent. Predicate 'carries' is canonical?
clarification_reason=Direct mapping of 'carries(riven, brass_seal)' to query intent. Predicate 'carries' is canonical.
predicates=['carries']
atoms=['brass_seal', 'riven'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of 'carries(riven, brass_seal)' to query intent. Predicate 'carries' is canonical?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 17, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 8, 'overlap_term_count': 4, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['brass', 'carries', 'riven', 'seal'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.6, 'progress_relevance_score': 0.6}
Turn Score
score
score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success

validation_summary

User
Run deterministic KB validations and compare against expectations.
tool calls1
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "carrier_resolved", "query": "carries(riven, brass_seal).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
  "status": "success",
  "result_type": "table",
  "predicate": "carries",
  "prolog_query": "carries(riven, brass_seal).",
  "variables": [],
  "rows": [
    {}
  ],
  "num_rows": 1,
  "reasoning_basis": {
    "kind": "core-local"
  }
}
Pre-Thinker
{
  "validation_total": 1,
  "validation_passed": 1,
  "overall_status": "passed",
  "turn_parse_failures": 0,
  "turn_apply_failures": 0
}
Validation Score
score
score=1.0 (1/1 passed)
Validation Notes
info
carrier_resolved: PASS (query=carries(riven, brass_seal)., expected=success, observed=success)
carrier_resolved
pass
query=carries(riven, brass_seal).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none