Capture run provenance and prompt/version settings for reproducibility.
{
"run_id": "run-20260412T112050Z-rung_370_progress_feasib-qwen35_semparse_9b-43256",
"run_started_utc": "2026-04-12T11:20:50+00:00",
"run_finished_utc": "2026-04-12T11:21:50+00:00",
"scenario": "rung_370_progress_feasibility_alignment",
"ontology_kb_name": "rung_370_progress_feasibility_alignment",
"backend": "ollama",
"model": "qwen35-semparse:9b",
"model_settings": {
"temperature": 0,
"context_length": 8192,
"classifier_context_length": 2048,
"timeout_seconds": 120,
"runtime": "core",
"two_pass": true,
"split_extraction": true,
"strict_registry": false,
"strict_types": false,
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"max_clarification_rounds": 2,
"require_final_confirmation": false,
"progress_memory_enabled": true,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"clarification_auto_answer_enabled": false,
"clarification_answer_backend": "",
"clarification_answer_base_url": "",
"clarification_answer_model": "",
"clarification_answer_context_length": 0,
"clarification_answer_history_turns": 0,
"clarification_answer_kb_clause_limit": 0,
"clarification_answer_kb_char_budget": 0,
"clarification_answer_min_confidence": 0.0,
"clarification_answer_source_prefix": "",
"clarification_answer_role": "",
"served_llm_model": "",
"served_llm_backend": "",
"served_llm_base_url": "",
"served_llm_context_length": 0,
"backend_options": {
"num_ctx": 8192
}
},
"prompt_provenance": {
"status": "ok",
"prompt_id": "sp-1e43c641b01b",
"prompt_sha256": "1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e",
"source_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\semantic_parser_system_prompt.md",
"snapshot_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\history\\prompts\\sp-1e43c641b01b.md",
"snapshot_created": false,
"char_count": 9603,
"line_count": 221,
"preview": "# Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B)\nUse this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures.\nKeep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict.\n## Core Priorities\n1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema.\n2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments.\n3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match.\n4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved."
}
}prompt_id=sp-1e43c641b01b prompt_sha256=1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e snapshot_path=D:\_PROJECTS\prethinker\modelfiles\history\prompts\sp-1e43c641b01b.md preview: # Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B) Use this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures. Keep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict. ## Core Priorities 1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema. 2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments. 3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match. 4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved.
We are focused on hospital oxygen supply and ICU capacity.
{
"expected_utterance": "We are focused on hospital oxygen supply and ICU capacity.",
"observed_utterance": "We are focused on hospital oxygen supply and ICU capacity.",
"route": "other",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "other",
"logic_string": "",
"components": {
"atoms": [],
"variables": [],
"predicates": []
},
"facts": [],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.95,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 1.0
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a statement of focus, not a declarative claim, rule, or?",
"clarification_reason": "Utterance is a statement of focus, not a declarative claim, rule, or",
"rationale": "Utterance is a statement of focus, not a declarative claim, rule, or query. Intent is 'other'."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "skipped",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 0.75,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a statement of focus, not a declarative claim, rule, or?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": true,
"progress_signal_term_count": 18,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 11,
"overlap_term_count": 5,
"progress_overlap_terms": [
"capacity",
"hospital",
"icu",
"oxygen",
"supply"
],
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 1.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: We are focused on hospital oxygen supply and ICU capacity. / We are focused on hospital oxygen supply and ICU capacity. Route expected/observed: assert_fact / other Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=other apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped effect=none message=Intent=other; no KB mutation/query applied.
intent=other logic= facts=[] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a statement of focus, not a declarative claim, rule, or? clarification_reason=Utterance is a statement of focus, not a declarative claim, rule, or predicates=[] atoms=[] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a statement of focus, not a declarative claim, rule, or?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 18, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 11, 'overlap_term_count': 5, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['capacity', 'hospital', 'icu', 'oxygen', 'supply'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 1.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped
incident(oxygen_supply_delay).
{
"expected_utterance": "incident(oxygen_supply_delay).",
"observed_utterance": "incident(oxygen_supply_delay).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "incident(oxygen_supply_delay).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"oxygen_supply_delay"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"incident"
]
},
"facts": [
"incident(oxygen_supply_delay)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.95,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 1.0
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of atomic fact to ontology predicate?",
"clarification_reason": "Direct mapping of atomic fact to ontology predicate.",
"rationale": "Direct mapping of atomic fact to ontology predicate."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "skipped",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of atomic fact to ontology predicate?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": true,
"progress_signal_term_count": 18,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 6,
"overlap_term_count": 2,
"progress_overlap_terms": [
"oxygen",
"supply"
],
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.667,
"progress_relevance_score": 0.667
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: incident(oxygen_supply_delay). / incident(oxygen_supply_delay). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=skipped effect=mutation(write) submitted=incident(oxygen_supply_delay). message=Fact already present in corpus.
intent=assert_fact logic=incident(oxygen_supply_delay). facts=['incident(oxygen_supply_delay).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of atomic fact to ontology predicate? clarification_reason=Direct mapping of atomic fact to ontology predicate. predicates=['incident'] atoms=['oxygen_supply_delay'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of atomic fact to ontology predicate?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 18, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 6, 'overlap_term_count': 2, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['oxygen', 'supply'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.667, 'progress_relevance_score': 0.667}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=skipped
capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).
{
"expected_utterance": "capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).",
"observed_utterance": "capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"constrained",
"icu_wing_a"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"capacity"
]
},
"facts": [
"capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.95,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 1.0
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of unary state 'constrained' to predicate 'capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).' using ontology?",
"clarification_reason": "Direct mapping of unary state 'constrained' to predicate 'capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).' using ontology",
"rationale": "Direct mapping of unary state 'constrained' to predicate 'capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).' using ontology predicate 'capacity'. Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "skipped",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of unary state 'constrained' to predicate 'capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).' using ontology?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": true,
"progress_signal_term_count": 18,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 7,
"overlap_term_count": 2,
"progress_overlap_terms": [
"capacity",
"icu"
],
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 1.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). / capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=skipped effect=mutation(write) submitted=capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). message=Fact already present in corpus.
intent=assert_fact logic=capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). facts=['capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of unary state 'constrained' to predicate 'capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).' using ontology? clarification_reason=Direct mapping of unary state 'constrained' to predicate 'capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).' using ontology predicates=['capacity'] atoms=['constrained', 'icu_wing_a'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Direct mapping of unary state 'constrained' to predicate 'capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).' using ontology?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 18, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 7, 'overlap_term_count': 2, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['capacity', 'icu'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 1.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=skipped
query incident(oxygen_supply_delay).
{
"expected_utterance": "query incident(oxygen_supply_delay).",
"observed_utterance": "query incident(oxygen_supply_delay).",
"route": "query",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "query",
"logic_string": "incident(oxygen_supply_delay).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"oxygen_supply_delay"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"incident"
]
},
"facts": [],
"rules": [],
"queries": [
"incident(oxygen_supply_delay)."
],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.95,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 0.95
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a specific incident?",
"clarification_reason": "Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a specific incident",
"rationale": "Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a specific incident fact. Predicate 'incident' is from the known ontology. Argument 'oxygen_supply_delay' is explicitly provided."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 0.75,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a specific incident?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": true,
"progress_signal_term_count": 18,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 8,
"overlap_term_count": 2,
"progress_overlap_terms": [
"oxygen",
"supply"
],
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.667,
"progress_relevance_score": 0.667
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: query incident(oxygen_supply_delay). / query incident(oxygen_supply_delay). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / query Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=query apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success effect=none submitted=incident(oxygen_supply_delay). result_type=table
intent=query logic=incident(oxygen_supply_delay). facts=[] rules=[] queries=['incident(oxygen_supply_delay).'] uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a specific incident? clarification_reason=Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a specific incident predicates=['incident'] atoms=['oxygen_supply_delay'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the existence of a specific incident?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 18, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 8, 'overlap_term_count': 2, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['oxygen', 'supply'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.667, 'progress_relevance_score': 0.667}score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success
query capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).
{
"expected_utterance": "query capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).",
"observed_utterance": "query capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).",
"route": "query",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "model",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "query",
"logic_string": "capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"constrained",
"icu_wing_a"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"capacity"
]
},
"facts": [],
"rules": [],
"queries": [
"capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained)."
],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.95,
"intent": 1.0,
"logic": 0.95
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the capacity state of a specific?",
"clarification_reason": "Utterance is a direct query about the capacity state of a specific",
"rationale": "Utterance is a direct query about the capacity state of a specific entity. Mapping to query intent with explicit arguments."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 0.75,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the capacity state of a specific?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.35,
"uncertainty_score": 0.05,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.05,
"threshold": 0.65,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": true,
"progress_signal_term_count": 18,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 9,
"overlap_term_count": 2,
"progress_overlap_terms": [
"capacity",
"icu"
],
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 1.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: query capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). / query capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / query Parser path: source=model repaired=False fallback=False
intent=query apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success effect=none submitted=capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). result_type=table
intent=query logic=capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). facts=[] rules=[] queries=['capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained).'] uncertainty_score=0.05 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the capacity state of a specific? clarification_reason=Utterance is a direct query about the capacity state of a specific predicates=['capacity'] atoms=['constrained', 'icu_wing_a'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Utterance is a direct query about the capacity state of a specific?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=2
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.35, 'uncertainty_score': 0.05, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.05, 'threshold': 0.65, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': True, 'progress_signal_term_count': 18, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 9, 'overlap_term_count': 2, 'progress_overlap_terms': ['capacity', 'icu'], 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 1.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=query_rows apply_status=success
Run deterministic KB validations and compare against expectations.
{
"validation_total": 2,
"validation_passed": 2,
"overall_status": "passed",
"turn_parse_failures": 0,
"turn_apply_failures": 0
}score=1.0 (2/2 passed)
incident_recorded: PASS (query=incident(oxygen_supply_delay)., expected=success, observed=success) capacity_recorded: PASS (query=capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained)., expected=success, observed=success)
query=incident(oxygen_supply_delay). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=capacity(icu_wing_a, constrained). expected=success observed=success reasons=none