Capture run provenance and prompt/version settings for reproducibility.
{
"run_id": "run-20260415T072906Z-story_glitch_in_the_airl-qwen3_5_9b-23988",
"run_started_utc": "2026-04-15T07:29:06+00:00",
"run_finished_utc": "2026-04-15T07:29:47+00:00",
"scenario": "story_glitch_in_the_airlock_roundtrip",
"ontology_kb_name": "story_glitch_in_the_airlock_roundtrip",
"backend": "ollama",
"model": "qwen3.5:9b",
"model_settings": {
"temperature": 0,
"context_length": 8192,
"classifier_context_length": 8192,
"timeout_seconds": 120,
"runtime": "core",
"two_pass": true,
"split_extraction": true,
"frontend_proposal_mode": "off",
"frontend_proposal_max_candidates": 8,
"frontend_proposal_min_score": 0.35,
"strict_registry": false,
"strict_types": false,
"temporal_dual_write": false,
"temporal_predicate": "at_step",
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"max_clarification_rounds": 1,
"require_final_confirmation": false,
"progress_memory_enabled": true,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"clarification_auto_answer_enabled": true,
"clarification_answer_backend": "ollama",
"clarification_answer_base_url": "http://127.0.0.1:11434",
"clarification_answer_model": "qwen3.5:9b",
"clarification_answer_context_length": 8192,
"clarification_answer_history_turns": 8,
"clarification_answer_kb_clause_limit": 80,
"clarification_answer_kb_char_budget": 5000,
"clarification_answer_min_confidence": 0.55,
"clarification_answer_source_prefix": "synthetic",
"clarification_answer_role": "proxy_model",
"served_llm_model": "",
"served_llm_backend": "",
"served_llm_base_url": "",
"served_llm_context_length": 0,
"sp_conflict_policy": "error",
"system_prompt_sources": {
"runtime_prompt_loaded": true,
"runtime_prompt_id": "sp-1e43c641b01b",
"runtime_prompt_sha256": "1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e",
"runtime_prompt_char_count": 9603,
"runtime_prompt_source_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\semantic_parser_system_prompt.md",
"baked_model_probe": {
"status": "ok",
"reason": "",
"has_system": false,
"system_prompt_id": "",
"system_sha256": "",
"char_count": 0,
"preview": ""
},
"semparse_name_hint": false,
"double_source_active": false,
"double_source_basis": "detected"
},
"backend_options": {
"num_ctx": 8192
}
},
"prompt_provenance": {
"status": "ok",
"prompt_id": "sp-1e43c641b01b",
"prompt_sha256": "1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e",
"source_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\semantic_parser_system_prompt.md",
"snapshot_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\history\\prompts\\sp-1e43c641b01b.md",
"snapshot_created": false,
"char_count": 9603,
"line_count": 221,
"preview": "# Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B)\nUse this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures.\nKeep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict.\n## Core Priorities\n1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema.\n2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments.\n3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match.\n4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved."
}
}prompt_id=sp-1e43c641b01b prompt_sha256=1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e snapshot_path=D:\_PROJECTS\prethinker\modelfiles\history\prompts\sp-1e43c641b01b.md preview: # Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B) Use this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures. Keep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict. ## Core Priorities 1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema. 2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments. 3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match. 4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved.
Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.
{
"expected_utterance": "Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.",
"observed_utterance": "Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.",
"route": "other",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "pre_normalizer",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": null,
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "skipped",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 0.75,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.0,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.0,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2. / Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2. Route expected/observed: assert_fact / other Parser path: source=pre_normalizer repaired=False fallback=False
intent=unknown apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped
effect=none
submitted={
"control_directive": "predicate_signature_declaration",
"raw_utterance": "Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.",
"declared_predicates": [
"activated",
"asked_if_occupied",
"blew_fuse",
"bounced_off",
"caused_effect",
"charred",
"climbed_into",
"docked_at",
"has_habit",
"has_item",
"has_trait",
"hit",
"hoped_for",
"is_a",
"just_right_for",
"liked",
"located_in",
"moved_in",
"performed",
"pushed_too_hard",
"reported",
"returned_from",
"saw",
"scouting_in",
"sipped",
"slept_in",
"station_silent",
"stepped_into",
"thrusters_flickered_out",
"too_cold",
"too_floaty",
"too_heavy",
"too_radioactive",
"too_sluggish",
"too_squishy",
"tried",
"vanished_into",
"woke_up",
"wore"
],
"declared_signatures": [
"activated/2",
"asked_if_occupied/2",
"blew_fuse/1",
"bounced_off/2",
"caused_effect/2",
"charred/1",
"climbed_into/2",
"docked_at/2",
"has_habit/2",
"has_item/2",
"has_trait/2",
"hit/2",
"hoped_for/2",
"is_a/2",
"just_right_for/2",
"liked/2",
"located_in/2",
"moved_in/2",
"performed/2",
"pushed_too_hard/2",
"reported/2",
"returned_from/2",
"saw/2",
"scouting_in/2",
"sipped/2",
"slept_in/2",
"station_silent/1",
"stepped_into/2",
"thrusters_flickered_out/1",
"too_cold/2",
"too_floaty/2",
"too_heavy/2",
"too_radioactive/2",
"too_sluggish/2",
"too_squishy/2",
"tried/2",
"vanished_into/2",
"woke_up/1",
"wore/2"
]
}
message=Consumed predicate-control directive before parse.intent=unknown logic= facts=[] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=None uncertainty_label=None needs_clarification=None clarification_question= clarification_reason= predicates=[] atoms=[] variables=[]
pending=False
question=
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.0, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.0, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False}score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped
Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).",
"observed_utterance": "Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"freelance_space_salvager",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"is_a"
]
},
"facts": [
"is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager). / Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager). result_type=fact_asserted fact=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).
intent=assert_fact logic=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager). facts=['is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['is_a'] atoms=['freelance_space_salvager', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"neon_blue_hair"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_trait"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair). / Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair). facts=['has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_trait'] atoms=['jax', 'neon_blue_hair'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"borrows_oxygen_without_permission",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_habit"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission). / Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission). facts=['has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_habit'] atoms=['borrows_oxygen_without_permission', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).",
"observed_utterance": "Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"nebula_sector"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"scouting_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector). / Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector). result_type=fact_asserted fact=scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).
intent=assert_fact logic=scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector). facts=['scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['scouting_in'] atoms=['jax', 'nebula_sector'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "thrusters_flickered_out(jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"thrusters_flickered_out"
]
},
"facts": [
"thrusters_flickered_out(jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax). / Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=thrusters_flickered_out(jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=thrusters_flickered_out(jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=thrusters_flickered_out(jax). facts=['thrusters_flickered_out(jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). predicates=['thrusters_flickered_out'] atoms=['jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"observed_utterance": "Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"docked_at"
]
},
"facts": [
"docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). / Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). result_type=fact_asserted fact=docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
intent=assert_fact logic=docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). facts=['docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['docked_at'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"observed_utterance": "Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"asked_if_occupied"
]
},
"facts": [
"asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). / Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). result_type=fact_asserted fact=asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
intent=assert_fact logic=asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). facts=['asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['asked_if_occupied'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"observed_utterance": "Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"station_silent"
]
},
"facts": [
"station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station). / Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station). result_type=fact_asserted fact=station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).
intent=assert_fact logic=station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station). facts=['station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). predicates=['station_silent'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station",
"mega_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell). facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station",
"eco_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell). facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'eco_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station",
"nano_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell). facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"galley_charging_station",
"mega_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station). / Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station). facts=['located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['galley_charging_station', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"eco_cell",
"galley_charging_station"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station). / Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station). facts=['located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['eco_cell', 'galley_charging_station'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"galley_charging_station",
"nano_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station). / Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station). facts=['located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['galley_charging_station', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set sipped(jax, mega_cell).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, mega_cell).",
"observed_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, mega_cell).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "sipped(jax, mega_cell).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"mega_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"sipped"
]
},
"facts": [
"sipped(jax, mega_cell)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set sipped(jax, mega_cell). / Set sipped(jax, mega_cell). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=sipped(jax, mega_cell). result_type=fact_asserted fact=sipped(jax, mega_cell).
intent=assert_fact logic=sipped(jax, mega_cell). facts=['sipped(jax, mega_cell).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['sipped'] atoms=['jax', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"mega_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"too_radioactive"
]
},
"facts": [
"too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax). / Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax). facts=['too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['too_radioactive'] atoms=['jax', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).",
"observed_utterance": "Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"glowing_green_teeth",
"mega_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"caused_effect"
]
},
"facts": [
"caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth). / Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth). result_type=fact_asserted fact=caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).
intent=assert_fact logic=caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth). facts=['caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['caused_effect'] atoms=['glowing_green_teeth', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set sipped(jax, eco_cell).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, eco_cell).",
"observed_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, eco_cell).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "sipped(jax, eco_cell).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"eco_cell",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"sipped"
]
},
"facts": [
"sipped(jax, eco_cell)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set sipped(jax, eco_cell). / Set sipped(jax, eco_cell). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=sipped(jax, eco_cell). result_type=fact_asserted fact=sipped(jax, eco_cell).
intent=assert_fact logic=sipped(jax, eco_cell). facts=['sipped(jax, eco_cell).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['sipped'] atoms=['eco_cell', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"eco_cell",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"too_sluggish"
]
},
"facts": [
"too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax). / Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax). facts=['too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['too_sluggish'] atoms=['eco_cell', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).",
"observed_utterance": "Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"eco_cell",
"swallowed_molasses_feeling"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"caused_effect"
]
},
"facts": [
"caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling). / Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling). result_type=fact_asserted fact=caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).
intent=assert_fact logic=caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling). facts=['caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['caused_effect'] atoms=['eco_cell', 'swallowed_molasses_feeling'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set sipped(jax, nano_cell).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, nano_cell).",
"observed_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, nano_cell).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "sipped(jax, nano_cell).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"nano_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"sipped"
]
},
"facts": [
"sipped(jax, nano_cell)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set sipped(jax, nano_cell). / Set sipped(jax, nano_cell). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=sipped(jax, nano_cell). result_type=fact_asserted fact=sipped(jax, nano_cell).
intent=assert_fact logic=sipped(jax, nano_cell). facts=['sipped(jax, nano_cell).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['sipped'] atoms=['jax', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"nano_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"just_right_for"
]
},
"facts": [
"just_right_for(nano_cell, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax). / Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax). facts=['just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['just_right_for'] atoms=['jax', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).",
"observed_utterance": "Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jetpack_crystalline_energy",
"nano_cell"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"caused_effect"
]
},
"facts": [
"caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy). / Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy). result_type=fact_asserted fact=caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).
intent=assert_fact logic=caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy). facts=['caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['caused_effect'] atoms=['jetpack_crystalline_energy', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station",
"titan_boots"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots). facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station",
"hover_slippers"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers). facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'hover_slippers'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"chrome_plated_dome_station",
"sonic_zips"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips). facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"mudroom",
"titan_boots"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(titan_boots, mudroom)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom). / Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(titan_boots, mudroom). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(titan_boots, mudroom). facts=['located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['mudroom', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"hover_slippers",
"mudroom"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom). / Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom). facts=['located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['hover_slippers', 'mudroom'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"mudroom",
"sonic_zips"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom). / Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom). facts=['located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['mudroom', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).",
"observed_utterance": "Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"titan_boots"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"stepped_into"
]
},
"facts": [
"stepped_into(jax, titan_boots)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots). / Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=stepped_into(jax, titan_boots). result_type=fact_asserted fact=stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).
intent=assert_fact logic=stepped_into(jax, titan_boots). facts=['stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['stepped_into'] atoms=['jax', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"titan_boots"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"too_heavy"
]
},
"facts": [
"too_heavy(titan_boots, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax). / Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax). facts=['too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['too_heavy'] atoms=['jax', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).",
"observed_utterance": "Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"could_not_lift_feet",
"titan_boots"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"caused_effect"
]
},
"facts": [
"caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet). / Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet). result_type=fact_asserted fact=caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).
intent=assert_fact logic=caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet). facts=['caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['caused_effect'] atoms=['could_not_lift_feet', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set tried(jax, hover_slippers).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set tried(jax, hover_slippers).",
"observed_utterance": "Set tried(jax, hover_slippers).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "tried(jax, hover_slippers).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"hover_slippers",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"tried"
]
},
"facts": [
"tried(jax, hover_slippers)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set tried(jax, hover_slippers). / Set tried(jax, hover_slippers). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=tried(jax, hover_slippers). result_type=fact_asserted fact=tried(jax, hover_slippers).
intent=assert_fact logic=tried(jax, hover_slippers). facts=['tried(jax, hover_slippers).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['tried'] atoms=['hover_slippers', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"hover_slippers",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"too_floaty"
]
},
"facts": [
"too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax). / Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax). facts=['too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['too_floaty'] atoms=['hover_slippers', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling).",
"observed_utterance": "Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "bounced_off(jax, ceiling).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"ceiling",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"bounced_off"
]
},
"facts": [
"bounced_off(jax, ceiling)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling). / Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=bounced_off(jax, ceiling). result_type=fact_asserted fact=bounced_off(jax, ceiling).
intent=assert_fact logic=bounced_off(jax, ceiling). facts=['bounced_off(jax, ceiling).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['bounced_off'] atoms=['ceiling', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set hit(jax, head).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set hit(jax, head).",
"observed_utterance": "Set hit(jax, head).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "hit(jax, head).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"head",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"hit"
]
},
"facts": [
"hit(jax, head)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set hit(jax, head). / Set hit(jax, head). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=hit(jax, head). result_type=fact_asserted fact=hit(jax, head).
intent=assert_fact logic=hit(jax, head). facts=['hit(jax, head).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['hit'] atoms=['head', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set wore(jax, sonic_zips).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set wore(jax, sonic_zips).",
"observed_utterance": "Set wore(jax, sonic_zips).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "wore(jax, sonic_zips).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"sonic_zips"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"wore"
]
},
"facts": [
"wore(jax, sonic_zips)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set wore(jax, sonic_zips). / Set wore(jax, sonic_zips). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=wore(jax, sonic_zips). result_type=fact_asserted fact=wore(jax, sonic_zips).
intent=assert_fact logic=wore(jax, sonic_zips). facts=['wore(jax, sonic_zips).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['wore'] atoms=['jax', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"sonic_zips"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"just_right_for"
]
},
"facts": [
"just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax). / Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax). facts=['just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['just_right_for'] atoms=['jax', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).",
"observed_utterance": "Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"sonic_zips"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"moved_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"moved_in(jax, sonic_zips)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips). / Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=moved_in(jax, sonic_zips). result_type=fact_asserted fact=moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).
intent=assert_fact logic=moved_in(jax, sonic_zips). facts=['moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['moved_in'] atoms=['jax', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).",
"observed_utterance": "Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"sonic_zips"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"pushed_too_hard"
]
},
"facts": [
"pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips). / Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips). result_type=fact_asserted fact=pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).
intent=assert_fact logic=pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips). facts=['pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['pushed_too_hard'] atoms=['jax', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips).",
"observed_utterance": "Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "blew_fuse(sonic_zips).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"sonic_zips"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"blew_fuse"
]
},
"facts": [
"blew_fuse(sonic_zips)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips). / Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=blew_fuse(sonic_zips). result_type=fact_asserted fact=blew_fuse(sonic_zips).
intent=assert_fact logic=blew_fuse(sonic_zips). facts=['blew_fuse(sonic_zips).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). predicates=['blew_fuse'] atoms=['sonic_zips'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set charred(sonic_zips).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set charred(sonic_zips).",
"observed_utterance": "Set charred(sonic_zips).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "charred(sonic_zips).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"sonic_zips"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"charred"
]
},
"facts": [
"charred(sonic_zips)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set charred(sonic_zips). / Set charred(sonic_zips). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=charred(sonic_zips). result_type=fact_asserted fact=charred(sonic_zips).
intent=assert_fact logic=charred(sonic_zips). facts=['charred(sonic_zips).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). predicates=['charred'] atoms=['sonic_zips'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"cryo_chamber",
"sleeping_quarters"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters). / Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters). facts=['located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'sleeping_quarters'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"memory_foam_cloud",
"sleeping_quarters"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters). / Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters). facts=['located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['memory_foam_cloud', 'sleeping_quarters'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).",
"observed_utterance": "Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"bio_hammock",
"sleeping_quarters"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"located_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters). / Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters). result_type=fact_asserted fact=located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).
intent=assert_fact logic=located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters). facts=['located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['located_in'] atoms=['bio_hammock', 'sleeping_quarters'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber).",
"observed_utterance": "Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "tried(jax, cryo_chamber).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"cryo_chamber",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"tried"
]
},
"facts": [
"tried(jax, cryo_chamber)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber). / Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=tried(jax, cryo_chamber). result_type=fact_asserted fact=tried(jax, cryo_chamber).
intent=assert_fact logic=tried(jax, cryo_chamber). facts=['tried(jax, cryo_chamber).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['tried'] atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"cryo_chamber",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"too_cold"
]
},
"facts": [
"too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax). / Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax). facts=['too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['too_cold'] atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).",
"observed_utterance": "Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"memory_foam_cloud"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"tried"
]
},
"facts": [
"tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud). / Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud). result_type=fact_asserted fact=tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).
intent=assert_fact logic=tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud). facts=['tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['tried'] atoms=['jax', 'memory_foam_cloud'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"memory_foam_cloud"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"too_squishy"
]
},
"facts": [
"too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax). / Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax). facts=['too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['too_squishy'] atoms=['jax', 'memory_foam_cloud'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).",
"observed_utterance": "Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"bio_hammock",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"climbed_into"
]
},
"facts": [
"climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock). / Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock). result_type=fact_asserted fact=climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).
intent=assert_fact logic=climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock). facts=['climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['climbed_into'] atoms=['bio_hammock', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"bio_hammock",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"just_right_for"
]
},
"facts": [
"just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax). / Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax). facts=['just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['just_right_for'] atoms=['bio_hammock', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).",
"observed_utterance": "Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"bio_hammock",
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"slept_in"
]
},
"facts": [
"slept_in(jax, bio_hammock)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock). / Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock). result_type=fact_asserted fact=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).
intent=assert_fact logic=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock). facts=['slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['slept_in'] atoms=['bio_hammock', 'jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).",
"observed_utterance": "Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"morning_spacewalk",
"unit_alpha"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"returned_from"
]
},
"facts": [
"returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk). / Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk). result_type=fact_asserted fact=returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).
intent=assert_fact logic=returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk). facts=['returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['returned_from'] atoms=['morning_spacewalk', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).",
"observed_utterance": "Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"morning_spacewalk",
"unit_beta"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"returned_from"
]
},
"facts": [
"returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk). / Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk). result_type=fact_asserted fact=returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).
intent=assert_fact logic=returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk). facts=['returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['returned_from'] atoms=['morning_spacewalk', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).",
"observed_utterance": "Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"morning_spacewalk",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"returned_from"
]
},
"facts": [
"returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk). / Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk). result_type=fact_asserted fact=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).
intent=assert_fact logic=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk). facts=['returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['returned_from'] atoms=['morning_spacewalk', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"high_grade_isotopes",
"unit_alpha"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes). / Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes). facts=['has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['high_grade_isotopes', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"organic_fuel",
"unit_beta"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel). / Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel). facts=['has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['organic_fuel', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(widget, nano_cell).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, nano_cell).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, nano_cell).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(widget, nano_cell).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"nano_cell",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(widget, nano_cell)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(widget, nano_cell). / Set has_item(widget, nano_cell). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(widget, nano_cell). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(widget, nano_cell).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(widget, nano_cell). facts=['has_item(widget, nano_cell).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['nano_cell', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"titan_boots",
"unit_alpha"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots). / Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots). facts=['has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['titan_boots', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"hover_slippers",
"unit_beta"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers). / Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers). facts=['has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['hover_slippers', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(widget, sonic_zips).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"sonic_zips",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(widget, sonic_zips)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips). / Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(widget, sonic_zips). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(widget, sonic_zips).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(widget, sonic_zips). facts=['has_item(widget, sonic_zips).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['sonic_zips', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"cryo_chamber",
"unit_alpha"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber). / Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber). facts=['has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"memory_foam_cloud",
"unit_beta"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud). / Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud). facts=['has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['memory_foam_cloud', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock).",
"observed_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "has_item(widget, bio_hammock).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"bio_hammock",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"has_item"
]
},
"facts": [
"has_item(widget, bio_hammock)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock). / Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=has_item(widget, bio_hammock). result_type=fact_asserted fact=has_item(widget, bio_hammock).
intent=assert_fact logic=has_item(widget, bio_hammock). facts=['has_item(widget, bio_hammock).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['has_item'] atoms=['bio_hammock', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"high_grade_isotopes",
"unit_alpha"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"reported",
"siphoned"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)). / Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)). facts=['reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['reported', 'siphoned'] atoms=['high_grade_isotopes', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"organic_fuel",
"unit_beta"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"reported",
"tasted"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)). / Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)). facts=['reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['reported', 'tasted'] atoms=['organic_fuel', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"nano_cell",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"drank",
"reported"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(widget, drank(nano_cell))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)). / Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)). facts=['reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['drank', 'reported'] atoms=['nano_cell', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(widget, emptied(vial)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"vial",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"emptied",
"reported"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(widget, emptied(vial))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)). / Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(widget, emptied(vial)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(widget, emptied(vial)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(widget, emptied(vial)). facts=['reported(widget, emptied(vial)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['emptied', 'reported'] atoms=['vial', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"titan_boots",
"unit_alpha"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"calibrate_attempt",
"reported"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)). / Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)). facts=['reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['calibrate_attempt', 'reported'] atoms=['titan_boots', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"hover_slippers",
"unit_beta"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"reported",
"scuff_marks"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)). / Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)). facts=['reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['reported', 'scuff_marks'] atoms=['hover_slippers', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"sonic_zips_motherboards",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"fried",
"reported"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)). / Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)). facts=['reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['fried', 'reported'] atoms=['sonic_zips_motherboards', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"cryo_chamber",
"unit_alpha"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"biological_entity_in",
"reported"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)). / Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)). facts=['reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['biological_entity_in', 'reported'] atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"memory_foam_cloud",
"unit_beta"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"compressed",
"reported"
]
},
"facts": [
"reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)). / Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).
intent=assert_fact logic=reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)). facts=['reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['compressed', 'reported'] atoms=['memory_foam_cloud', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"bio_hammock",
"jax",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"asleep_in",
"saw"
]
},
"facts": [
"saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)). / Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).
intent=assert_fact logic=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)). facts=['saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['asleep_in', 'saw'] atoms=['bio_hammock', 'jax', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set woke_up(jax).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set woke_up(jax).",
"observed_utterance": "Set woke_up(jax).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "woke_up(jax).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"woke_up"
]
},
"facts": [
"woke_up(jax)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set woke_up(jax). / Set woke_up(jax). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=woke_up(jax). result_type=fact_asserted fact=woke_up(jax).
intent=assert_fact logic=woke_up(jax). facts=['woke_up(jax).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). predicates=['woke_up'] atoms=['jax'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set saw(jax, unit_alpha).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set saw(jax, unit_alpha).",
"observed_utterance": "Set saw(jax, unit_alpha).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "saw(jax, unit_alpha).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"unit_alpha"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"saw"
]
},
"facts": [
"saw(jax, unit_alpha)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set saw(jax, unit_alpha). / Set saw(jax, unit_alpha). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=saw(jax, unit_alpha). result_type=fact_asserted fact=saw(jax, unit_alpha).
intent=assert_fact logic=saw(jax, unit_alpha). facts=['saw(jax, unit_alpha).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['saw'] atoms=['jax', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set saw(jax, unit_beta).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set saw(jax, unit_beta).",
"observed_utterance": "Set saw(jax, unit_beta).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "saw(jax, unit_beta).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"unit_beta"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"saw"
]
},
"facts": [
"saw(jax, unit_beta)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set saw(jax, unit_beta). / Set saw(jax, unit_beta). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=saw(jax, unit_beta). result_type=fact_asserted fact=saw(jax, unit_beta).
intent=assert_fact logic=saw(jax, unit_beta). facts=['saw(jax, unit_beta).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['saw'] atoms=['jax', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set saw(jax, widget).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set saw(jax, widget).",
"observed_utterance": "Set saw(jax, widget).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "saw(jax, widget).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"saw"
]
},
"facts": [
"saw(jax, widget)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set saw(jax, widget). / Set saw(jax, widget). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=saw(jax, widget). result_type=fact_asserted fact=saw(jax, widget).
intent=assert_fact logic=saw(jax, widget). facts=['saw(jax, widget).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['saw'] atoms=['jax', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set activated(jax, jetpack).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set activated(jax, jetpack).",
"observed_utterance": "Set activated(jax, jetpack).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "activated(jax, jetpack).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"jetpack"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"activated"
]
},
"facts": [
"activated(jax, jetpack)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set activated(jax, jetpack). / Set activated(jax, jetpack). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=activated(jax, jetpack). result_type=fact_asserted fact=activated(jax, jetpack).
intent=assert_fact logic=activated(jax, jetpack). facts=['activated(jax, jetpack).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['activated'] atoms=['jax', 'jetpack'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).",
"observed_utterance": "Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"performed"
]
},
"facts": [
"performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock). / Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock). result_type=fact_asserted fact=performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).
intent=assert_fact logic=performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock). facts=['performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['performed'] atoms=['jax', 'zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set vanished_into(jax, starfield).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set vanished_into(jax, starfield).",
"observed_utterance": "Set vanished_into(jax, starfield).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "vanished_into(jax, starfield).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"starfield"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"vanished_into"
]
},
"facts": [
"vanished_into(jax, starfield)."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set vanished_into(jax, starfield). / Set vanished_into(jax, starfield). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=vanished_into(jax, starfield). result_type=fact_asserted fact=vanished_into(jax, starfield).
intent=assert_fact logic=vanished_into(jax, starfield). facts=['vanished_into(jax, starfield).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['vanished_into'] atoms=['jax', 'starfield'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"hoped_for",
"leave_review_on_galactic_map"
]
},
"facts": [
"hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)). / Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).
intent=assert_fact logic=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)). facts=['hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['hoped_for', 'leave_review_on_galactic_map'] atoms=['jax', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).
{
"expected_utterance": "Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).",
"observed_utterance": "Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).",
"route": "assert_fact",
"expected_route": "assert_fact",
"route_source": "explicit_command",
"repaired": false,
"fallback_used": false,
"parsed": {
"intent": "assert_fact",
"logic_string": "liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).",
"components": {
"atoms": [
"jax",
"widget"
],
"variables": [],
"predicates": [
"fuel_of",
"liked"
]
},
"facts": [
"liked(jax, fuel_of(widget))."
],
"rules": [],
"queries": [],
"confidence": {
"overall": 0.72,
"intent": 0.82,
"logic": 0.68
},
"ambiguities": [],
"needs_clarification": false,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"uncertainty_label": "low",
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
"rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
},
"validation_errors": [],
"apply_status": "success",
"utterance_ok": 1.0,
"turn_score": 1.0,
"clarification_rounds": [],
"clarification_pending": false,
"clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
"clarification_policy": {
"clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
"uncertainty_score": 0.24,
"effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
"threshold": 0.8,
"request_clarification": false,
"needs_clarification_flag": false,
"progress_low_relevance": false,
"progress_high_risk": false,
"progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
"progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
"progress_memory_available": true,
"progress_focus_present": false,
"progress_signal_term_count": 0,
"parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
"overlap_term_count": 0,
"progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
"progress_relevance_score": 1.0
}
}Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference. Utterance expected/observed: Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)). / Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)). Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success effect=mutation(write) submitted=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)). result_type=fact_asserted fact=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).
intent=assert_fact logic=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)). facts=['liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).'] rules=[] queries=[] uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low needs_clarification=False clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order? clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order. predicates=['fuel_of', 'liked'] atoms=['jax', 'widget'] variables=[]
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0) apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
Run deterministic KB validations and compare against expectations.
{
"validation_total": 25,
"validation_passed": 25,
"overall_status": "passed",
"turn_parse_failures": 0,
"turn_apply_failures": 0
}score=1.0 (25/25 passed)
jax_role: PASS (query=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager)., expected=success, observed=success) jax_hair: PASS (query=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair)., expected=success, observed=success) mega_cell_radioactive: PASS (query=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax)., expected=success, observed=success) eco_cell_sluggish: PASS (query=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax)., expected=success, observed=success) nano_cell_fit: PASS (query=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax)., expected=success, observed=success) titan_too_heavy: PASS (query=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax)., expected=success, observed=success) hover_too_floaty: PASS (query=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax)., expected=success, observed=success) sonic_blew_fuse: PASS (query=blew_fuse(sonic_zips)., expected=success, observed=success) sonic_charred: PASS (query=charred(sonic_zips)., expected=success, observed=success) cryo_too_cold: PASS (query=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax)., expected=success, observed=success) memory_too_squishy: PASS (query=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax)., expected=success, observed=success) slept_in_hammock: PASS (query=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock)., expected=success, observed=success) widget_returned: PASS (query=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk)., expected=success, observed=success) alpha_report_isotopes: PASS (query=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes))., expected=success, observed=success) widget_report_fried: PASS (query=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards))., expected=success, observed=success) widget_saw_sleeping: PASS (query=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock))., expected=success, observed=success) jax_saw_alpha: PASS (query=saw(jax, unit_alpha)., expected=success, observed=success) jax_activated_jetpack: PASS (query=activated(jax, jetpack)., expected=success, observed=success) jax_vanished_starfield: PASS (query=vanished_into(jax, starfield)., expected=success, observed=success) widget_hoped_review: PASS (query=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax))., expected=success, observed=success) jax_liked_widget_fuel: PASS (query=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget))., expected=success, observed=success) nano_not_radioactive: PASS (query=too_radioactive(nano_cell, jax)., expected=no_results, observed=no_results) titan_not_floaty: PASS (query=too_floaty(titan_boots, jax)., expected=no_results, observed=no_results) jax_not_sleeping_in_cryo: PASS (query=slept_in(jax, cryo_chamber)., expected=no_results, observed=no_results) hover_not_charred: PASS (query=charred(hover_slippers)., expected=no_results, observed=no_results)
query=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=blew_fuse(sonic_zips). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=charred(sonic_zips). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=saw(jax, unit_alpha). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=activated(jax, jetpack). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=vanished_into(jax, starfield). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)). expected=success observed=success reasons=none
query=too_radioactive(nano_cell, jax). expected=no_results observed=no_results reasons=none
query=too_floaty(titan_boots, jax). expected=no_results observed=no_results reasons=none
query=slept_in(jax, cryo_chamber). expected=no_results observed=no_results reasons=none
query=charred(hover_slippers). expected=no_results observed=no_results reasons=none