The Glitch in the Airlock - Roundtrip (Canonical Ingest)

Captured: 2026-04-15T07:31:40+00:00 | Model: qwen3.5:9b | Integration: ollama | Initial skin: standard | Rendered: 2026-04-15 07:31:40 UTC

run_context

User
Capture run provenance and prompt/version settings for reproducibility.
tool calls0

No tool calls captured.

Pre-Thinker
{
  "run_id": "run-20260415T072906Z-story_glitch_in_the_airl-qwen3_5_9b-23988",
  "run_started_utc": "2026-04-15T07:29:06+00:00",
  "run_finished_utc": "2026-04-15T07:29:47+00:00",
  "scenario": "story_glitch_in_the_airlock_roundtrip",
  "ontology_kb_name": "story_glitch_in_the_airlock_roundtrip",
  "backend": "ollama",
  "model": "qwen3.5:9b",
  "model_settings": {
    "temperature": 0,
    "context_length": 8192,
    "classifier_context_length": 8192,
    "timeout_seconds": 120,
    "runtime": "core",
    "two_pass": true,
    "split_extraction": true,
    "frontend_proposal_mode": "off",
    "frontend_proposal_max_candidates": 8,
    "frontend_proposal_min_score": 0.35,
    "strict_registry": false,
    "strict_types": false,
    "temporal_dual_write": false,
    "temporal_predicate": "at_step",
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "max_clarification_rounds": 1,
    "require_final_confirmation": false,
    "progress_memory_enabled": true,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "clarification_auto_answer_enabled": true,
    "clarification_answer_backend": "ollama",
    "clarification_answer_base_url": "http://127.0.0.1:11434",
    "clarification_answer_model": "qwen3.5:9b",
    "clarification_answer_context_length": 8192,
    "clarification_answer_history_turns": 8,
    "clarification_answer_kb_clause_limit": 80,
    "clarification_answer_kb_char_budget": 5000,
    "clarification_answer_min_confidence": 0.55,
    "clarification_answer_source_prefix": "synthetic",
    "clarification_answer_role": "proxy_model",
    "served_llm_model": "",
    "served_llm_backend": "",
    "served_llm_base_url": "",
    "served_llm_context_length": 0,
    "sp_conflict_policy": "error",
    "system_prompt_sources": {
      "runtime_prompt_loaded": true,
      "runtime_prompt_id": "sp-1e43c641b01b",
      "runtime_prompt_sha256": "1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e",
      "runtime_prompt_char_count": 9603,
      "runtime_prompt_source_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\semantic_parser_system_prompt.md",
      "baked_model_probe": {
        "status": "ok",
        "reason": "",
        "has_system": false,
        "system_prompt_id": "",
        "system_sha256": "",
        "char_count": 0,
        "preview": ""
      },
      "semparse_name_hint": false,
      "double_source_active": false,
      "double_source_basis": "detected"
    },
    "backend_options": {
      "num_ctx": 8192
    }
  },
  "prompt_provenance": {
    "status": "ok",
    "prompt_id": "sp-1e43c641b01b",
    "prompt_sha256": "1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e",
    "source_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\semantic_parser_system_prompt.md",
    "snapshot_path": "D:\\_PROJECTS\\prethinker\\modelfiles\\history\\prompts\\sp-1e43c641b01b.md",
    "snapshot_created": false,
    "char_count": 9603,
    "line_count": 221,
    "preview": "# Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B)\nUse this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures.\nKeep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict.\n## Core Priorities\n1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema.\n2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments.\n3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match.\n4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved."
  }
}
Prompt Provenance
info
prompt_id=sp-1e43c641b01b
prompt_sha256=1e43c641b01b7c845b82331b521d58c1993e8010bd9283f5085dac687520159e
snapshot_path=D:\_PROJECTS\prethinker\modelfiles\history\prompts\sp-1e43c641b01b.md
preview:
# Semantic Parser Prompt Pack (Qwen 3.5 9B)
Use this as maintainable guidance for semantic parsing into Prolog structures.
Keep behavior language-agnostic, deterministic, and schema-strict.
## Core Priorities
1. Output exactly one JSON object that matches the required schema.
2. Preserve semantic meaning; do not hallucinate entities, facts, or arguments.
3. Prefer canonical, stable predicate names across turns when semantics match.
4. Use variables instead of assumptions when referents are unresolved.

turn_01: other [skipped]

User
Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::none { "turn_index": 1, "input": { "control_directive": "predicate_signature_declaration", "raw_utterance": "Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.", "declared_predicates": [ "activated", "asked_if_occupied", "blew_fuse", "bounced_off", "caused_effect", "charred", "climbed_into", "docked_at", "has_habit", "has_item", "has_trait", "hit", "hoped_for", "is_a", "just_right_for", "liked", "located_in", "moved_in", "performed", "pushed_too_hard", "reported", "returned_from", "saw", "scouting_in", "sipped", "slept_in", "station_silent", "stepped_into", "thrusters_flickered_out", "too_cold", "too_floaty", "too_heavy", "too_radioactive", "too_sluggish", "too_squishy", "tried", "vanished_into", "woke_up", "wore" ], "declared_signatures": [ "activated/2", "asked_if_occupied/2", "blew_fuse/1", "bounced_off/2", "caused_effect/2", "charred/1", "climbed_into/2", "docked_at/2", "has_habit/2", "has_item/2", "has_trait/2", "hit/2", "hoped_for/2", "is_a/2", "just_right_for/2", "liked/2", "located_in/2", "moved_in/2", "performed/2", "pushed_too_hard/2", "reported/2", "returned_from/2", "saw/2", "scouting_in/2", "sipped/2", "slept_in/2", "station_silent/1", "stepped_into/2", "thrusters_flickered_out/1", "too_cold/2", "too_floaty/2", "too_heavy/2", "too_radioactive/2", "too_sluggish/2", "too_squishy/2", "tried/2", "vanished_into/2", "woke_up/1", "wore/2" ] } }
    output
    {
      "status": "skipped",
      "message": "Consumed predicate-control directive before parse."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.",
  "observed_utterance": "Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.",
  "route": "other",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "pre_normalizer",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": null,
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "skipped",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 0.75,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.0,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.0,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2. / Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / other
Parser path: source=pre_normalizer repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=unknown apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped
effect=none
submitted={
  "control_directive": "predicate_signature_declaration",
  "raw_utterance": "Use is_a/2, has_trait/2, has_habit/2, scouting_in/2, thrusters_flickered_out/1, docked_at/2, asked_if_occupied/2, station_silent/1, has_item/2, located_in/2, sipped/2, too_radioactive/2, too_sluggish/2, just_right_for/2, caused_effect/2, stepped_into/2, too_heavy/2, tried/2, too_floaty/2, bounced_off/2, hit/2, wore/2, moved_in/2, pushed_too_hard/2, blew_fuse/1, charred/1, too_cold/2, too_squishy/2, climbed_into/2, slept_in/2, returned_from/2, reported/2, saw/2, woke_up/1, activated/2, performed/2, vanished_into/2, hoped_for/2, liked/2.",
  "declared_predicates": [
    "activated",
    "asked_if_occupied",
    "blew_fuse",
    "bounced_off",
    "caused_effect",
    "charred",
    "climbed_into",
    "docked_at",
    "has_habit",
    "has_item",
    "has_trait",
    "hit",
    "hoped_for",
    "is_a",
    "just_right_for",
    "liked",
    "located_in",
    "moved_in",
    "performed",
    "pushed_too_hard",
    "reported",
    "returned_from",
    "saw",
    "scouting_in",
    "sipped",
    "slept_in",
    "station_silent",
    "stepped_into",
    "thrusters_flickered_out",
    "too_cold",
    "too_floaty",
    "too_heavy",
    "too_radioactive",
    "too_sluggish",
    "too_squishy",
    "tried",
    "vanished_into",
    "woke_up",
    "wore"
  ],
  "declared_signatures": [
    "activated/2",
    "asked_if_occupied/2",
    "blew_fuse/1",
    "bounced_off/2",
    "caused_effect/2",
    "charred/1",
    "climbed_into/2",
    "docked_at/2",
    "has_habit/2",
    "has_item/2",
    "has_trait/2",
    "hit/2",
    "hoped_for/2",
    "is_a/2",
    "just_right_for/2",
    "liked/2",
    "located_in/2",
    "moved_in/2",
    "performed/2",
    "pushed_too_hard/2",
    "reported/2",
    "returned_from/2",
    "saw/2",
    "scouting_in/2",
    "sipped/2",
    "slept_in/2",
    "station_silent/1",
    "stepped_into/2",
    "thrusters_flickered_out/1",
    "too_cold/2",
    "too_floaty/2",
    "too_heavy/2",
    "too_radioactive/2",
    "too_sluggish/2",
    "too_squishy/2",
    "tried/2",
    "vanished_into/2",
    "woke_up/1",
    "wore/2"
  ]
}
message=Consumed predicate-control directive before parse.
KB Elements
info
intent=unknown
logic=
facts=[]
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=None uncertainty_label=None
needs_clarification=None
clarification_question=
clarification_reason=
predicates=[]
atoms=[] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.0, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.0, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False}
Turn Score
score
score=0.75 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=0.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=none apply_status=skipped

turn_02: assert_fact [success]

User
Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 2, "input": "is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "freelance_space_salvager",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "is_a"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager). / Set is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).
facts=['is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['is_a']
atoms=['freelance_space_salvager', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_03: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 3, "input": "has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "neon_blue_hair"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_trait"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair). / Set has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).
facts=['has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_trait']
atoms=['jax', 'neon_blue_hair'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_04: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 4, "input": "has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "borrows_oxygen_without_permission",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_habit"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission). / Set has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).
facts=['has_habit(jax, borrows_oxygen_without_permission).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_habit']
atoms=['borrows_oxygen_without_permission', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_05: assert_fact [success]

User
Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 5, "input": "scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "nebula_sector"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "scouting_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector). / Set scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).
facts=['scouting_in(jax, nebula_sector).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['scouting_in']
atoms=['jax', 'nebula_sector'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_06: assert_fact [success]

User
Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 6, "input": "thrusters_flickered_out(jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "thrusters_flickered_out(jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "thrusters_flickered_out(jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "thrusters_flickered_out"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "thrusters_flickered_out(jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax). / Set thrusters_flickered_out(jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=thrusters_flickered_out(jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=thrusters_flickered_out(jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=thrusters_flickered_out(jax).
facts=['thrusters_flickered_out(jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).
predicates=['thrusters_flickered_out']
atoms=['jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_07: assert_fact [success]

User
Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 7, "input": "docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "docked_at"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). / Set docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
facts=['docked_at(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['docked_at']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_08: assert_fact [success]

User
Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 8, "input": "asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "asked_if_occupied"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station). / Set asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).
facts=['asked_if_occupied(jax, chrome_plated_dome_station).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['asked_if_occupied']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_09: assert_fact [success]

User
Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 9, "input": "station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "station_silent"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station). / Set station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).
facts=['station_silent(chrome_plated_dome_station).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).
predicates=['station_silent']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_10: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 10, "input": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station",
        "mega_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).
facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, mega_cell).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_11: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 11, "input": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station",
        "eco_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).
facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, eco_cell).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'eco_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_12: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 12, "input": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station",
        "nano_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).
facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, nano_cell).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_13: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 13, "input": "located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "galley_charging_station",
        "mega_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station). / Set located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).
facts=['located_in(mega_cell, galley_charging_station).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['galley_charging_station', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_14: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 14, "input": "located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "eco_cell",
        "galley_charging_station"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station). / Set located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).
facts=['located_in(eco_cell, galley_charging_station).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['eco_cell', 'galley_charging_station'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_15: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 15, "input": "located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "galley_charging_station",
        "nano_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station). / Set located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).
facts=['located_in(nano_cell, galley_charging_station).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['galley_charging_station', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_16: assert_fact [success]

User
Set sipped(jax, mega_cell).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 16, "input": "sipped(jax, mega_cell)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "sipped(jax, mega_cell)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, mega_cell).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, mega_cell).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "sipped(jax, mega_cell).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "mega_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "sipped"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "sipped(jax, mega_cell)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set sipped(jax, mega_cell). / Set sipped(jax, mega_cell).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=sipped(jax, mega_cell).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=sipped(jax, mega_cell).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=sipped(jax, mega_cell).
facts=['sipped(jax, mega_cell).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['sipped']
atoms=['jax', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_17: assert_fact [success]

User
Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 17, "input": "too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "mega_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "too_radioactive"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax). / Set too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).
facts=['too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['too_radioactive']
atoms=['jax', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_18: assert_fact [success]

User
Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 18, "input": "caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "glowing_green_teeth",
        "mega_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "caused_effect"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth). / Set caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).
facts=['caused_effect(mega_cell, glowing_green_teeth).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['caused_effect']
atoms=['glowing_green_teeth', 'mega_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_19: assert_fact [success]

User
Set sipped(jax, eco_cell).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 19, "input": "sipped(jax, eco_cell)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "sipped(jax, eco_cell)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, eco_cell).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, eco_cell).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "sipped(jax, eco_cell).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "eco_cell",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "sipped"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "sipped(jax, eco_cell)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set sipped(jax, eco_cell). / Set sipped(jax, eco_cell).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=sipped(jax, eco_cell).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=sipped(jax, eco_cell).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=sipped(jax, eco_cell).
facts=['sipped(jax, eco_cell).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['sipped']
atoms=['eco_cell', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_20: assert_fact [success]

User
Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 20, "input": "too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "eco_cell",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "too_sluggish"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax). / Set too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).
facts=['too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['too_sluggish']
atoms=['eco_cell', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_21: assert_fact [success]

User
Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 21, "input": "caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "eco_cell",
        "swallowed_molasses_feeling"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "caused_effect"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling). / Set caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).
facts=['caused_effect(eco_cell, swallowed_molasses_feeling).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['caused_effect']
atoms=['eco_cell', 'swallowed_molasses_feeling'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_22: assert_fact [success]

User
Set sipped(jax, nano_cell).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 22, "input": "sipped(jax, nano_cell)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "sipped(jax, nano_cell)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, nano_cell).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set sipped(jax, nano_cell).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "sipped(jax, nano_cell).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "nano_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "sipped"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "sipped(jax, nano_cell)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set sipped(jax, nano_cell). / Set sipped(jax, nano_cell).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=sipped(jax, nano_cell).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=sipped(jax, nano_cell).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=sipped(jax, nano_cell).
facts=['sipped(jax, nano_cell).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['sipped']
atoms=['jax', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_23: assert_fact [success]

User
Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 23, "input": "just_right_for(nano_cell, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "just_right_for(nano_cell, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "nano_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "just_right_for"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "just_right_for(nano_cell, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax). / Set just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).
facts=['just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['just_right_for']
atoms=['jax', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_24: assert_fact [success]

User
Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 24, "input": "caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jetpack_crystalline_energy",
        "nano_cell"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "caused_effect"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy). / Set caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).
facts=['caused_effect(nano_cell, jetpack_crystalline_energy).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['caused_effect']
atoms=['jetpack_crystalline_energy', 'nano_cell'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_25: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 25, "input": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station",
        "titan_boots"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).
facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, titan_boots).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_26: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 26, "input": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station",
        "hover_slippers"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).
facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, hover_slippers).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'hover_slippers'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_27: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 27, "input": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "chrome_plated_dome_station",
        "sonic_zips"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips). / Set has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).
facts=['has_item(chrome_plated_dome_station, sonic_zips).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['chrome_plated_dome_station', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_28: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 28, "input": "located_in(titan_boots, mudroom)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(titan_boots, mudroom)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "mudroom",
        "titan_boots"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(titan_boots, mudroom)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom). / Set located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).
facts=['located_in(titan_boots, mudroom).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['mudroom', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_29: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 29, "input": "located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "hover_slippers",
        "mudroom"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom). / Set located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).
facts=['located_in(hover_slippers, mudroom).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['hover_slippers', 'mudroom'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_30: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 30, "input": "located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "mudroom",
        "sonic_zips"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom). / Set located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).
facts=['located_in(sonic_zips, mudroom).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['mudroom', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_31: assert_fact [success]

User
Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 31, "input": "stepped_into(jax, titan_boots)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "stepped_into(jax, titan_boots)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "titan_boots"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "stepped_into"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "stepped_into(jax, titan_boots)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots). / Set stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).
facts=['stepped_into(jax, titan_boots).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['stepped_into']
atoms=['jax', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_32: assert_fact [success]

User
Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 32, "input": "too_heavy(titan_boots, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "too_heavy(titan_boots, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "titan_boots"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "too_heavy"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "too_heavy(titan_boots, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax). / Set too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).
facts=['too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['too_heavy']
atoms=['jax', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_33: assert_fact [success]

User
Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 33, "input": "caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "could_not_lift_feet",
        "titan_boots"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "caused_effect"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet). / Set caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).
facts=['caused_effect(titan_boots, could_not_lift_feet).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['caused_effect']
atoms=['could_not_lift_feet', 'titan_boots'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_34: assert_fact [success]

User
Set tried(jax, hover_slippers).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 34, "input": "tried(jax, hover_slippers)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "tried(jax, hover_slippers)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set tried(jax, hover_slippers).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set tried(jax, hover_slippers).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "tried(jax, hover_slippers).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "hover_slippers",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "tried"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "tried(jax, hover_slippers)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set tried(jax, hover_slippers). / Set tried(jax, hover_slippers).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=tried(jax, hover_slippers).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=tried(jax, hover_slippers).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=tried(jax, hover_slippers).
facts=['tried(jax, hover_slippers).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['tried']
atoms=['hover_slippers', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_35: assert_fact [success]

User
Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 35, "input": "too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "hover_slippers",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "too_floaty"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax). / Set too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).
facts=['too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['too_floaty']
atoms=['hover_slippers', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_36: assert_fact [success]

User
Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 36, "input": "bounced_off(jax, ceiling)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "bounced_off(jax, ceiling)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "bounced_off(jax, ceiling).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "ceiling",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "bounced_off"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "bounced_off(jax, ceiling)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling). / Set bounced_off(jax, ceiling).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=bounced_off(jax, ceiling).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=bounced_off(jax, ceiling).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=bounced_off(jax, ceiling).
facts=['bounced_off(jax, ceiling).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['bounced_off']
atoms=['ceiling', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_37: assert_fact [success]

User
Set hit(jax, head).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 37, "input": "hit(jax, head)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "hit(jax, head)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set hit(jax, head).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set hit(jax, head).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "hit(jax, head).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "head",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "hit"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "hit(jax, head)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set hit(jax, head). / Set hit(jax, head).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=hit(jax, head).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=hit(jax, head).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=hit(jax, head).
facts=['hit(jax, head).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['hit']
atoms=['head', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_38: assert_fact [success]

User
Set wore(jax, sonic_zips).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 38, "input": "wore(jax, sonic_zips)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "wore(jax, sonic_zips)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set wore(jax, sonic_zips).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set wore(jax, sonic_zips).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "wore(jax, sonic_zips).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "sonic_zips"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "wore"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "wore(jax, sonic_zips)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set wore(jax, sonic_zips). / Set wore(jax, sonic_zips).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=wore(jax, sonic_zips).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=wore(jax, sonic_zips).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=wore(jax, sonic_zips).
facts=['wore(jax, sonic_zips).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['wore']
atoms=['jax', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_39: assert_fact [success]

User
Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 39, "input": "just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "sonic_zips"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "just_right_for"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax). / Set just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).
facts=['just_right_for(sonic_zips, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['just_right_for']
atoms=['jax', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_40: assert_fact [success]

User
Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 40, "input": "moved_in(jax, sonic_zips)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "moved_in(jax, sonic_zips)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "sonic_zips"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "moved_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "moved_in(jax, sonic_zips)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips). / Set moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).
facts=['moved_in(jax, sonic_zips).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['moved_in']
atoms=['jax', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_41: assert_fact [success]

User
Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 41, "input": "pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "sonic_zips"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "pushed_too_hard"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips). / Set pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).
facts=['pushed_too_hard(jax, sonic_zips).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['pushed_too_hard']
atoms=['jax', 'sonic_zips'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_42: assert_fact [success]

User
Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 42, "input": "blew_fuse(sonic_zips)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "blew_fuse(sonic_zips)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "blew_fuse(sonic_zips).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "sonic_zips"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "blew_fuse"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "blew_fuse(sonic_zips)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips). / Set blew_fuse(sonic_zips).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=blew_fuse(sonic_zips).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=blew_fuse(sonic_zips).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=blew_fuse(sonic_zips).
facts=['blew_fuse(sonic_zips).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).
predicates=['blew_fuse']
atoms=['sonic_zips'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_43: assert_fact [success]

User
Set charred(sonic_zips).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 43, "input": "charred(sonic_zips)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "charred(sonic_zips)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set charred(sonic_zips).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set charred(sonic_zips).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "charred(sonic_zips).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "sonic_zips"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "charred"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "charred(sonic_zips)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set charred(sonic_zips). / Set charred(sonic_zips).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=charred(sonic_zips).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=charred(sonic_zips).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=charred(sonic_zips).
facts=['charred(sonic_zips).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).
predicates=['charred']
atoms=['sonic_zips'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_44: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 44, "input": "located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "cryo_chamber",
        "sleeping_quarters"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters). / Set located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).
facts=['located_in(cryo_chamber, sleeping_quarters).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'sleeping_quarters'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_45: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 45, "input": "located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "memory_foam_cloud",
        "sleeping_quarters"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters). / Set located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).
facts=['located_in(memory_foam_cloud, sleeping_quarters).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['memory_foam_cloud', 'sleeping_quarters'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_46: assert_fact [success]

User
Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 46, "input": "located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "bio_hammock",
        "sleeping_quarters"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "located_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters). / Set located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).
facts=['located_in(bio_hammock, sleeping_quarters).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['located_in']
atoms=['bio_hammock', 'sleeping_quarters'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_47: assert_fact [success]

User
Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 47, "input": "tried(jax, cryo_chamber)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "tried(jax, cryo_chamber)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "tried(jax, cryo_chamber).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "cryo_chamber",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "tried"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "tried(jax, cryo_chamber)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber). / Set tried(jax, cryo_chamber).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=tried(jax, cryo_chamber).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=tried(jax, cryo_chamber).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=tried(jax, cryo_chamber).
facts=['tried(jax, cryo_chamber).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['tried']
atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_48: assert_fact [success]

User
Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 48, "input": "too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "cryo_chamber",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "too_cold"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax). / Set too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).
facts=['too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['too_cold']
atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_49: assert_fact [success]

User
Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 49, "input": "tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "memory_foam_cloud"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "tried"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud). / Set tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).
facts=['tried(jax, memory_foam_cloud).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['tried']
atoms=['jax', 'memory_foam_cloud'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_50: assert_fact [success]

User
Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 50, "input": "too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "memory_foam_cloud"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "too_squishy"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax). / Set too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).
facts=['too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['too_squishy']
atoms=['jax', 'memory_foam_cloud'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_51: assert_fact [success]

User
Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 51, "input": "climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "bio_hammock",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "climbed_into"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock). / Set climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).
facts=['climbed_into(jax, bio_hammock).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['climbed_into']
atoms=['bio_hammock', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_52: assert_fact [success]

User
Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 52, "input": "just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "bio_hammock",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "just_right_for"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax). / Set just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).
facts=['just_right_for(bio_hammock, jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['just_right_for']
atoms=['bio_hammock', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_53: assert_fact [success]

User
Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 53, "input": "slept_in(jax, bio_hammock)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "slept_in(jax, bio_hammock)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "bio_hammock",
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "slept_in"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "slept_in(jax, bio_hammock)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock). / Set slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).
facts=['slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['slept_in']
atoms=['bio_hammock', 'jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_54: assert_fact [success]

User
Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 54, "input": "returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "morning_spacewalk",
        "unit_alpha"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "returned_from"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk). / Set returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).
facts=['returned_from(unit_alpha, morning_spacewalk).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['returned_from']
atoms=['morning_spacewalk', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_55: assert_fact [success]

User
Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 55, "input": "returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "morning_spacewalk",
        "unit_beta"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "returned_from"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk). / Set returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).
facts=['returned_from(unit_beta, morning_spacewalk).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['returned_from']
atoms=['morning_spacewalk', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_56: assert_fact [success]

User
Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 56, "input": "returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "morning_spacewalk",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "returned_from"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk). / Set returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).
facts=['returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['returned_from']
atoms=['morning_spacewalk', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_57: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 57, "input": "has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "high_grade_isotopes",
        "unit_alpha"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes). / Set has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).
facts=['has_item(unit_alpha, high_grade_isotopes).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['high_grade_isotopes', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_58: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 58, "input": "has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "organic_fuel",
        "unit_beta"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel). / Set has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).
facts=['has_item(unit_beta, organic_fuel).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['organic_fuel', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_59: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(widget, nano_cell).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 59, "input": "has_item(widget, nano_cell)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(widget, nano_cell)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, nano_cell).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, nano_cell).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(widget, nano_cell).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "nano_cell",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(widget, nano_cell)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(widget, nano_cell). / Set has_item(widget, nano_cell).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(widget, nano_cell).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(widget, nano_cell).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(widget, nano_cell).
facts=['has_item(widget, nano_cell).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['nano_cell', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_60: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 60, "input": "has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "titan_boots",
        "unit_alpha"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots). / Set has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).
facts=['has_item(unit_alpha, titan_boots).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['titan_boots', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_61: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 61, "input": "has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "hover_slippers",
        "unit_beta"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers). / Set has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).
facts=['has_item(unit_beta, hover_slippers).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['hover_slippers', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_62: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 62, "input": "has_item(widget, sonic_zips)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(widget, sonic_zips)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(widget, sonic_zips).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "sonic_zips",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(widget, sonic_zips)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips). / Set has_item(widget, sonic_zips).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(widget, sonic_zips).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(widget, sonic_zips).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(widget, sonic_zips).
facts=['has_item(widget, sonic_zips).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['sonic_zips', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_63: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 63, "input": "has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "cryo_chamber",
        "unit_alpha"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber). / Set has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).
facts=['has_item(unit_alpha, cryo_chamber).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_64: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 64, "input": "has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "memory_foam_cloud",
        "unit_beta"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud). / Set has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).
facts=['has_item(unit_beta, memory_foam_cloud).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['memory_foam_cloud', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_65: assert_fact [success]

User
Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 65, "input": "has_item(widget, bio_hammock)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "has_item(widget, bio_hammock)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "has_item(widget, bio_hammock).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "bio_hammock",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "has_item"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "has_item(widget, bio_hammock)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock). / Set has_item(widget, bio_hammock).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=has_item(widget, bio_hammock).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=has_item(widget, bio_hammock).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=has_item(widget, bio_hammock).
facts=['has_item(widget, bio_hammock).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['has_item']
atoms=['bio_hammock', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_66: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 66, "input": "reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "high_grade_isotopes",
        "unit_alpha"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "reported",
        "siphoned"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)). / Set reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).
facts=['reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['reported', 'siphoned']
atoms=['high_grade_isotopes', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_67: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 67, "input": "reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "organic_fuel",
        "unit_beta"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "reported",
        "tasted"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)). / Set reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).
facts=['reported(unit_beta, tasted(organic_fuel)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['reported', 'tasted']
atoms=['organic_fuel', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_68: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 68, "input": "reported(widget, drank(nano_cell))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(widget, drank(nano_cell))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "nano_cell",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "drank",
        "reported"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(widget, drank(nano_cell))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)). / Set reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).
facts=['reported(widget, drank(nano_cell)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['drank', 'reported']
atoms=['nano_cell', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_69: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 69, "input": "reported(widget, emptied(vial))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(widget, emptied(vial))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(widget, emptied(vial)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "vial",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "emptied",
        "reported"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(widget, emptied(vial))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)). / Set reported(widget, emptied(vial)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(widget, emptied(vial)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(widget, emptied(vial)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(widget, emptied(vial)).
facts=['reported(widget, emptied(vial)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['emptied', 'reported']
atoms=['vial', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_70: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 70, "input": "reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "titan_boots",
        "unit_alpha"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "calibrate_attempt",
        "reported"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)). / Set reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).
facts=['reported(unit_alpha, calibrate_attempt(titan_boots)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['calibrate_attempt', 'reported']
atoms=['titan_boots', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_71: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 71, "input": "reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "hover_slippers",
        "unit_beta"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "reported",
        "scuff_marks"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)). / Set reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).
facts=['reported(unit_beta, scuff_marks(hover_slippers)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['reported', 'scuff_marks']
atoms=['hover_slippers', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_72: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 72, "input": "reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "sonic_zips_motherboards",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "fried",
        "reported"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)). / Set reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).
facts=['reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['fried', 'reported']
atoms=['sonic_zips_motherboards', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_73: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 73, "input": "reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "cryo_chamber",
        "unit_alpha"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "biological_entity_in",
        "reported"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)). / Set reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).
facts=['reported(unit_alpha, biological_entity_in(cryo_chamber)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['biological_entity_in', 'reported']
atoms=['cryo_chamber', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_74: assert_fact [success]

User
Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 74, "input": "reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "memory_foam_cloud",
        "unit_beta"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "compressed",
        "reported"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)). / Set reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).
facts=['reported(unit_beta, compressed(memory_foam_cloud)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['compressed', 'reported']
atoms=['memory_foam_cloud', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_75: assert_fact [success]

User
Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 75, "input": "saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "bio_hammock",
        "jax",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "asleep_in",
        "saw"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)). / Set saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).
facts=['saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['asleep_in', 'saw']
atoms=['bio_hammock', 'jax', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_76: assert_fact [success]

User
Set woke_up(jax).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 76, "input": "woke_up(jax)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "woke_up(jax)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set woke_up(jax).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set woke_up(jax).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "woke_up(jax).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "woke_up"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "woke_up(jax)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set woke_up(jax). / Set woke_up(jax).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=woke_up(jax).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=woke_up(jax).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=woke_up(jax).
facts=['woke_up(jax).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact).
predicates=['woke_up']
atoms=['jax'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact)?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_77: assert_fact [success]

User
Set saw(jax, unit_alpha).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 77, "input": "saw(jax, unit_alpha)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "saw(jax, unit_alpha)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set saw(jax, unit_alpha).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set saw(jax, unit_alpha).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "saw(jax, unit_alpha).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "unit_alpha"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "saw"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "saw(jax, unit_alpha)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set saw(jax, unit_alpha). / Set saw(jax, unit_alpha).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=saw(jax, unit_alpha).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=saw(jax, unit_alpha).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=saw(jax, unit_alpha).
facts=['saw(jax, unit_alpha).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['saw']
atoms=['jax', 'unit_alpha'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_78: assert_fact [success]

User
Set saw(jax, unit_beta).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 78, "input": "saw(jax, unit_beta)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "saw(jax, unit_beta)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set saw(jax, unit_beta).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set saw(jax, unit_beta).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "saw(jax, unit_beta).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "unit_beta"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "saw"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "saw(jax, unit_beta)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set saw(jax, unit_beta). / Set saw(jax, unit_beta).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=saw(jax, unit_beta).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=saw(jax, unit_beta).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=saw(jax, unit_beta).
facts=['saw(jax, unit_beta).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['saw']
atoms=['jax', 'unit_beta'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_79: assert_fact [success]

User
Set saw(jax, widget).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 79, "input": "saw(jax, widget)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "saw(jax, widget)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set saw(jax, widget).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set saw(jax, widget).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "saw(jax, widget).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "saw"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "saw(jax, widget)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set saw(jax, widget). / Set saw(jax, widget).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=saw(jax, widget).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=saw(jax, widget).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=saw(jax, widget).
facts=['saw(jax, widget).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['saw']
atoms=['jax', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_80: assert_fact [success]

User
Set activated(jax, jetpack).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 80, "input": "activated(jax, jetpack)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "activated(jax, jetpack)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set activated(jax, jetpack).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set activated(jax, jetpack).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "activated(jax, jetpack).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "jetpack"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "activated"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "activated(jax, jetpack)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set activated(jax, jetpack). / Set activated(jax, jetpack).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=activated(jax, jetpack).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=activated(jax, jetpack).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=activated(jax, jetpack).
facts=['activated(jax, jetpack).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['activated']
atoms=['jax', 'jetpack'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_81: assert_fact [success]

User
Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 81, "input": "performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "performed"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock). / Set performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).
facts=['performed(jax, zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['performed']
atoms=['jax', 'zero_gravity_backflip_through_airlock'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_82: assert_fact [success]

User
Set vanished_into(jax, starfield).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 82, "input": "vanished_into(jax, starfield)." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "vanished_into(jax, starfield)."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set vanished_into(jax, starfield).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set vanished_into(jax, starfield).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "vanished_into(jax, starfield).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "starfield"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "vanished_into"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "vanished_into(jax, starfield)."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set vanished_into(jax, starfield). / Set vanished_into(jax, starfield).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=vanished_into(jax, starfield).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=vanished_into(jax, starfield).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=vanished_into(jax, starfield).
facts=['vanished_into(jax, starfield).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['vanished_into']
atoms=['jax', 'starfield'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_83: assert_fact [success]

User
Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 83, "input": "hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "hoped_for",
        "leave_review_on_galactic_map"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)). / Set hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).
facts=['hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['hoped_for', 'leave_review_on_galactic_map']
atoms=['jax', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

turn_84: assert_fact [success]

User
Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).
tool calls1
  • kb_apply::assert_fact { "turn_index": 84, "input": "liked(jax, fuel_of(widget))." }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "fact_asserted",
      "fact": "liked(jax, fuel_of(widget))."
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "expected_utterance": "Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).",
  "observed_utterance": "Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).",
  "route": "assert_fact",
  "expected_route": "assert_fact",
  "route_source": "explicit_command",
  "repaired": false,
  "fallback_used": false,
  "parsed": {
    "intent": "assert_fact",
    "logic_string": "liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).",
    "components": {
      "atoms": [
        "jax",
        "widget"
      ],
      "variables": [],
      "predicates": [
        "fuel_of",
        "liked"
      ]
    },
    "facts": [
      "liked(jax, fuel_of(widget))."
    ],
    "rules": [],
    "queries": [],
    "confidence": {
      "overall": 0.72,
      "intent": 0.82,
      "logic": 0.68
    },
    "ambiguities": [],
    "needs_clarification": false,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "uncertainty_label": "low",
    "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
    "clarification_reason": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.",
    "rationale": "Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order."
  },
  "validation_errors": [],
  "apply_status": "success",
  "utterance_ok": 1.0,
  "turn_score": 1.0,
  "clarification_rounds": [],
  "clarification_pending": false,
  "clarification_question": "Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?",
  "clarification_policy": {
    "clarification_eagerness": 0.2,
    "uncertainty_score": 0.24,
    "effective_uncertainty": 0.24,
    "threshold": 0.8,
    "request_clarification": false,
    "needs_clarification_flag": false,
    "progress_low_relevance": false,
    "progress_high_risk": false,
    "progress_low_relevance_threshold": 0.34,
    "progress_high_risk_threshold": 0.18,
    "progress_memory_available": true,
    "progress_focus_present": false,
    "progress_signal_term_count": 0,
    "parsed_signal_term_count": 0,
    "overlap_term_count": 0,
    "progress_best_focus_overlap": 0.0,
    "progress_relevance_score": 1.0
  }
}
Prethinker Annotation
info
Why asked: Seed grounded terms/constants as facts for later inference.
Utterance expected/observed: Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)). / Set liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).
Route expected/observed: assert_fact / assert_fact
Parser path: source=explicit_command repaired=False fallback=False
KB Action
info
intent=assert_fact apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success
effect=mutation(write)
submitted=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).
result_type=fact_asserted
fact=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).
KB Elements
info
intent=assert_fact
logic=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).
facts=['liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).']
rules=[]
queries=[]
uncertainty_score=0.24 uncertainty_label=low
needs_clarification=False
clarification_question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
clarification_reason=Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order.
predicates=['fuel_of', 'liked']
atoms=['jax', 'widget'] variables=[]
Clarification Policy
info
pending=False
question=Can you clarify this point before I apply it: Deterministic explicit command parse (assert_fact). Directional fact guard corrected inverted subject/object order?
rounds_used=0 max_rounds=1
policy={'clarification_eagerness': 0.2, 'uncertainty_score': 0.24, 'effective_uncertainty': 0.24, 'threshold': 0.8, 'request_clarification': False, 'needs_clarification_flag': False, 'progress_low_relevance': False, 'progress_high_risk': False, 'progress_low_relevance_threshold': 0.34, 'progress_high_risk_threshold': 0.18, 'progress_memory_available': True, 'progress_focus_present': False, 'progress_signal_term_count': 0, 'parsed_signal_term_count': 0, 'overlap_term_count': 0, 'progress_best_focus_overlap': 0.0, 'progress_relevance_score': 1.0}
Turn Score
score
score=1.0 (parse_ok=1.0, route_ok=1.0, apply_ok=1.0, utterance_ok=1.0)
apply_tool=assert_fact apply_status=success

validation_summary

User
Run deterministic KB validations and compare against expectations.
tool calls25
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "jax_role", "query": "is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "is_a",
      "prolog_query": "is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "jax_hair", "query": "has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "has_trait",
      "prolog_query": "has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "mega_cell_radioactive", "query": "too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "too_radioactive",
      "prolog_query": "too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "eco_cell_sluggish", "query": "too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "too_sluggish",
      "prolog_query": "too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "nano_cell_fit", "query": "just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "just_right_for",
      "prolog_query": "just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "titan_too_heavy", "query": "too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "too_heavy",
      "prolog_query": "too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "hover_too_floaty", "query": "too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "too_floaty",
      "prolog_query": "too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "sonic_blew_fuse", "query": "blew_fuse(sonic_zips).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "blew_fuse",
      "prolog_query": "blew_fuse(sonic_zips).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "sonic_charred", "query": "charred(sonic_zips).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "charred",
      "prolog_query": "charred(sonic_zips).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "cryo_too_cold", "query": "too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "too_cold",
      "prolog_query": "too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "memory_too_squishy", "query": "too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "too_squishy",
      "prolog_query": "too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "slept_in_hammock", "query": "slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "slept_in",
      "prolog_query": "slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "widget_returned", "query": "returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "returned_from",
      "prolog_query": "returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "alpha_report_isotopes", "query": "reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "reported",
      "prolog_query": "reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "widget_report_fried", "query": "reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "reported",
      "prolog_query": "reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "widget_saw_sleeping", "query": "saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "saw",
      "prolog_query": "saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "jax_saw_alpha", "query": "saw(jax, unit_alpha).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "saw",
      "prolog_query": "saw(jax, unit_alpha).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "jax_activated_jetpack", "query": "activated(jax, jetpack).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "activated",
      "prolog_query": "activated(jax, jetpack).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "jax_vanished_starfield", "query": "vanished_into(jax, starfield).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "vanished_into",
      "prolog_query": "vanished_into(jax, starfield).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "widget_hoped_review", "query": "hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "hoped_for",
      "prolog_query": "hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "jax_liked_widget_fuel", "query": "liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).", "expected_status": "success" }
    output
    {
      "status": "success",
      "result_type": "table",
      "predicate": "liked",
      "prolog_query": "liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [
        {}
      ],
      "num_rows": 1,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "nano_not_radioactive", "query": "too_radioactive(nano_cell, jax).", "expected_status": "no_results" }
    output
    {
      "status": "no_results",
      "result_type": "no_result",
      "predicate": "too_radioactive",
      "prolog_query": "too_radioactive(nano_cell, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [],
      "num_rows": 0,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "titan_not_floaty", "query": "too_floaty(titan_boots, jax).", "expected_status": "no_results" }
    output
    {
      "status": "no_results",
      "result_type": "no_result",
      "predicate": "too_floaty",
      "prolog_query": "too_floaty(titan_boots, jax).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [],
      "num_rows": 0,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "jax_not_sleeping_in_cryo", "query": "slept_in(jax, cryo_chamber).", "expected_status": "no_results" }
    output
    {
      "status": "no_results",
      "result_type": "no_result",
      "predicate": "slept_in",
      "prolog_query": "slept_in(jax, cryo_chamber).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [],
      "num_rows": 0,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
  • validation::query_rows { "id": "hover_not_charred", "query": "charred(hover_slippers).", "expected_status": "no_results" }
    output
    {
      "status": "no_results",
      "result_type": "no_result",
      "predicate": "charred",
      "prolog_query": "charred(hover_slippers).",
      "variables": [],
      "rows": [],
      "num_rows": 0,
      "reasoning_basis": {
        "kind": "core-local"
      }
    }
Pre-Thinker
{
  "validation_total": 25,
  "validation_passed": 25,
  "overall_status": "passed",
  "turn_parse_failures": 0,
  "turn_apply_failures": 0
}
Validation Score
score
score=1.0 (25/25 passed)
Validation Notes
info
jax_role: PASS (query=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager)., expected=success, observed=success)
jax_hair: PASS (query=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair)., expected=success, observed=success)
mega_cell_radioactive: PASS (query=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax)., expected=success, observed=success)
eco_cell_sluggish: PASS (query=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax)., expected=success, observed=success)
nano_cell_fit: PASS (query=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax)., expected=success, observed=success)
titan_too_heavy: PASS (query=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax)., expected=success, observed=success)
hover_too_floaty: PASS (query=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax)., expected=success, observed=success)
sonic_blew_fuse: PASS (query=blew_fuse(sonic_zips)., expected=success, observed=success)
sonic_charred: PASS (query=charred(sonic_zips)., expected=success, observed=success)
cryo_too_cold: PASS (query=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax)., expected=success, observed=success)
memory_too_squishy: PASS (query=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax)., expected=success, observed=success)
slept_in_hammock: PASS (query=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock)., expected=success, observed=success)
widget_returned: PASS (query=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk)., expected=success, observed=success)
alpha_report_isotopes: PASS (query=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes))., expected=success, observed=success)
widget_report_fried: PASS (query=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards))., expected=success, observed=success)
widget_saw_sleeping: PASS (query=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock))., expected=success, observed=success)
jax_saw_alpha: PASS (query=saw(jax, unit_alpha)., expected=success, observed=success)
jax_activated_jetpack: PASS (query=activated(jax, jetpack)., expected=success, observed=success)
jax_vanished_starfield: PASS (query=vanished_into(jax, starfield)., expected=success, observed=success)
widget_hoped_review: PASS (query=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax))., expected=success, observed=success)
jax_liked_widget_fuel: PASS (query=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget))., expected=success, observed=success)
nano_not_radioactive: PASS (query=too_radioactive(nano_cell, jax)., expected=no_results, observed=no_results)
titan_not_floaty: PASS (query=too_floaty(titan_boots, jax)., expected=no_results, observed=no_results)
jax_not_sleeping_in_cryo: PASS (query=slept_in(jax, cryo_chamber)., expected=no_results, observed=no_results)
hover_not_charred: PASS (query=charred(hover_slippers)., expected=no_results, observed=no_results)
jax_role
pass
query=is_a(jax, freelance_space_salvager).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
jax_hair
pass
query=has_trait(jax, neon_blue_hair).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
mega_cell_radioactive
pass
query=too_radioactive(mega_cell, jax).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
eco_cell_sluggish
pass
query=too_sluggish(eco_cell, jax).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
nano_cell_fit
pass
query=just_right_for(nano_cell, jax).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
titan_too_heavy
pass
query=too_heavy(titan_boots, jax).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
hover_too_floaty
pass
query=too_floaty(hover_slippers, jax).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
sonic_blew_fuse
pass
query=blew_fuse(sonic_zips).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
sonic_charred
pass
query=charred(sonic_zips).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
cryo_too_cold
pass
query=too_cold(cryo_chamber, jax).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
memory_too_squishy
pass
query=too_squishy(memory_foam_cloud, jax).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
slept_in_hammock
pass
query=slept_in(jax, bio_hammock).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
widget_returned
pass
query=returned_from(widget, morning_spacewalk).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
alpha_report_isotopes
pass
query=reported(unit_alpha, siphoned(high_grade_isotopes)).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
widget_report_fried
pass
query=reported(widget, fried(sonic_zips_motherboards)).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
widget_saw_sleeping
pass
query=saw(widget, asleep_in(jax, bio_hammock)).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
jax_saw_alpha
pass
query=saw(jax, unit_alpha).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
jax_activated_jetpack
pass
query=activated(jax, jetpack).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
jax_vanished_starfield
pass
query=vanished_into(jax, starfield).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
widget_hoped_review
pass
query=hoped_for(widget, leave_review_on_galactic_map(jax)).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
jax_liked_widget_fuel
pass
query=liked(jax, fuel_of(widget)).
expected=success observed=success
reasons=none
nano_not_radioactive
pass
query=too_radioactive(nano_cell, jax).
expected=no_results observed=no_results
reasons=none
titan_not_floaty
pass
query=too_floaty(titan_boots, jax).
expected=no_results observed=no_results
reasons=none
jax_not_sleeping_in_cryo
pass
query=slept_in(jax, cryo_chamber).
expected=no_results observed=no_results
reasons=none
hover_not_charred
pass
query=charred(hover_slippers).
expected=no_results observed=no_results
reasons=none